![]() |
![]() |
BiH Media Round-up, 28/03/2001 |
BiH Parliament's House of Representatives endorsed candidacy of Belkic and
Krizanovic for the post in the BiH Presidency:
Jutarnje Novine: Ramiz Mehmedagic, the Federation Minister of Urban
Planning and Environment "Restitution law will cause turbulence" This law has been in the parliamentary procedure for a while. The procedure of determining the text before the Parliament has been finalized, and all submitted amendments have been tested. This means that the next step is the formal voting. I believe that it would be advisable to inform the new composition of the House of Representatives and the House of People about the text which had been brought by former deputies to this stage. It would not be correct asking this House to adopt something only to satisfy the procedure. This is why we believe that the new government should be acquainted with this text, and if the government accepts it, then we go before the Parliament with the final text. True, there have been certain indications coming from the OHR that one should also consider the financial restitution, since the prepared law is based on the natural restitution. What would that mean? There is a significant difference between the two. The natural restitution represents the return of property in its physical state, while the financial would include paying for that property. Both methods have been used in European, in particular East European, countries, and the experiences vary. Both methods have their disadvantages. I think that neither methods could be applied to BiH. The property has been confiscated in different ways, every country has different financial capacity and, therefore, different possibility for restitution. BiH has a specific position, it has just come out of the war, it is destroyed, and financially weak. The property which has been confiscated since 1945, and the one taken after 1918, is of different structure then the property in Slovenia, Czech Republic or Hungary. In these countries, only large property had been nationalized, and BiH does not have large property except for those which were taken in the period between 1918 and 1941. What has been confiscated since 1945 is by and large smaller property. I believe that the change of the starting point is the main condition for the financial restitution, i.e., the starting point can in no way be 1945 but 1918. At the end of the last year, you said that "at this moment, no one has guts to pas the Restitution Law." Has this changed? This law cannot be passed without causing major turbulence in the sphere of ownership. This process will surely hurt both the present occupants and former owners, and not a single law will be able to satisfy all sides. Here, the sides are confronting each other, and it is the responsibility of the state to resolve this issue in the least painful way. In any case, it has to resolve it once and for all, since the privatization cannot go on uninterrupted until this law is passed, and also because the political parities which are participating in authority must fulfill their promise to return the confiscated property. The Restitution Law is one of important ones in the Alliance's platform. I expect that the parties within the Alliance will be able to resolve this issue, that is, they are obliged to resolve it. In a case that the new government and the Parliament decide on the financial restitution, they should make sure to know from which fund they will secure the compensation, and they should change the starting point, i.e., the year. Some 80,000 citizens, who live in the nationalized apartments, ask for the removal of article 47 from the Law on purchase of apartments according to which apartments that are liable for restitution are excluded from the law until the Restitution Law is passed. What is your position? My position remains the same. This means that the article 47 cannot be erased until the restitution law is passed. They are announcing protests if their status is not equalized with the status of other occupancy rights holders. They have the same status as other occupancy rights holders. The procedure of purchase has not been completed yet and will likely last two or three more years. I do not feel that this group of occupancy rights holders is so special. They are fully realizing their occupancy rights and, so far, no one has questioned their rights. But they want to buy the flats. We have left a possibility that apartments are purchased under the same conditions in the future as well. This means that these apartments can be bought with certificates as well once the Restitution Law is passed but under the condition that this law emphasizes that there is no natural restitution, that is, that there is no return of flats to their earlier owners, but that the current users have the right to purchase them under the same conditions. I am not afraid of protests and I feel that these statements are premature. Their rights are by no means jeopardized and there is no need for such hasty statements. It is also relative how many such tenants there are. When we talk about 18,000 apartments, among them there are those that will be freed of restitution or have already been paid for through international agreements, and there will be no obstacles for current tenants to purchase them. In addition, some vakuf apartments are not pure vakuf apartments but vidajet-vakuf and as such are not to be returned, which means they can be purchased. The number of 18,000 is possible in the Federation but with different status under the future Restitution Law and under the Law on Purchase of apartments. Accordingly, we will try to resolve this problem this year.
HVO troops leave barracks in Mostar, Vitez and Kiseljak: Meanwhile, Federation Army officials could not confirm or comment on this move of the HVO troops, but strongly condemned yesterday's call of the HNS to temporary disband the Croat component. "Decision of the so-called Croat self-rule and the civilian commander Marko Tokic on temporary dissolution of the Croat component of the Federation Army is illegal and invalid," read the statement of the Federation Ministry of Defense. The Ministry accused the HDZ, who stands behind all decision of the Croat National Assembly, of trying to "draw into their dirty political games as many decent people as possible to whom their salaries are the only source of income," and advised Croat soldiers not to be tricked by the illegal calls of the self-styled institution such as the HNS.
Commander of the First Guardian Corps in Mostar Zlatan Mijo Jelic says all
Croats will leave the Federation Army within 24 hours:
Dismissed commander of the Fourth Guardian Corps in Orasje destroys
important documents:
Headquarters for protection of identity and interest of Croat people
formed in Vitez:
Commander of Joint Command of the Federation army: Federation Army is not
falling apart:
Federation authorities say parallel financial system would collapse within
five days:
Deputy Chief of the US Mission to BiH, Cristopher Hoh, says Croat National
Assembly does not represent BiH Croats:
Croatian Parliament Deputy Speaker Zdravko Tomac said Croat National
Assembly is democratically oriented: "The new HNS leadership is democratically orientated and BiH Croats do not want to re-establish Herceg Bosna," he said. "The crisis in BIH was caused by the development of the Republika Srpska as an ethnically clean state, while the BiH Federation developed in opposite direction," Tomac said, adding that the crisis culminated when the OSCE Mission in BiH changed the election rules. "The reaction of Bosnian Croats on that decision was too hard and was not in the interest of Croats," he concluded. Ante Jelavic sends an open letter to Jacques Plaul Klein: In the letter to Klein, whom he addresses as retired general, Jelavic said that Klein's statements after the recent moves by the self-styled Croat National Assembly (HNS) were " a part of plan of the international community which is aimed at discrediting the political leadership of BiH Croats." "You have been constantly trying to make a criminal out of me, a dangerous opponent of the Dayton agreement, with the manners of politician-beginner who has a power in his hands...Obviously referring to the establishment of the Croat self-rule, You have the courage and honor to speak about one-sided change of the Dayton agreement, and You know well that the self-rule is our temporary answer to drastic violations of the Dayton agreement," Jelavic said in the letter. He also accused Klein, the High Representative, Wolfgang Petritsch, and the Head of the OSCE Mission in BiH, Robert Barry, of one-sided violation of the Dayton agreement and of a silent revision of the agreement, which is "unjust and painful for Croats." "With that revision You have gone so far that You did not respect the results of the general elections and forced all the legitimate Croat officials from all parliamentary bodies in BIH," Jelavic said. Noting that the international community and not the HDZ or the HNS changed the Dayton agreement, Jelavic said that the international community allowed and stimulated the unconstitutional change of the election rules and regulation. He ended his letter by wishing Klein "end of his mandate in BiH.
Federation Parliament's House of Peoples names judges of the Federation
Supreme Court:
The ICTY Prosecutor Carla del Ponte meets the High Representative Wolfgang
Petritsch in Sarajevo:
Wolfgang Petritsch to meet the EU Troika:
|
The BiH Media Round-up is being compiled primarily for the OHR's internal purposes under time pressure. Please disregard grammar and typing mistakes. The mentioned media reports do not reflect OHR views, and the OHR does not take responsibility for them. |
|