 |
Report of the High Representative for Implementation of the Bosnian Peace Agreement to the Secretary-General
of the United Nations
1 October 1996
|
- Introduction
- Pursuant to Security Council resolution 1031 (1995) of 15 December
1995, which endorsed my appointment as High Representative to monitor the
implementation of the Peace Agreement and mobilize and, as appropriate,
give guidance to, and coordinate the activities of the civilian
organizations and agencies involved in the implementation of the Peace
Agreement on Bosnia and Herzegovina, I hereby submit my third report
envisaged in Annex 10 of the Peace Agreement and the Conclusions of the
London Peace Implementation Conference, held on 8 and 9 December 1995.
- The present report covers developments in the areas listed below during
the period from the beginning of July to the end of September 1996.
- Institutional Aspects
Office of the High Representative
- My headquarters in Sarajevo and the secretariat in Brussels have in the
period under review continued to maintain operational coordination of
civilian implementation activities inside Bosnia and Herzegovina and
strategic-level contacts with the headquarters of the respective
implementation organizations and agencies, closely following, to the extent
possible, the various international gatherings dealing with the Bosnian
peace implementation.
- In addition to the regional branch office of the High Representative in
Banja Luka, a representative of the Office of the High Representative (OHR)
has started working in Tuzla, the second largest city in the territory of
the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, providing a valuable point of
contact to the different official and political institutions in the
important northern region of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Working Groups of the International Conference on the Former Yugoslavia
- The Working Group on National Minorities under Ambassador Martin Lutz
continued to maintain regular contact with ethnic groups within the Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia and Croatia, as well as with the Governments of the
two countries.
- My team will continue to encourage dialogue on Kosovo between the
Government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the legitimate
representatives of the Kosovar Albanians and will continue to suggest
initiatives for reducing tension in that volatile area. In this context I
welcome the agreement on education in Kosovo signed on 1 September and look
forward to its early implementation.
- The Special Negotiator on State Succession Issues, Sir Arthur Watts,
held a third round of discussions in Brussels with each of the five States
in July. In the light of those and previous discussions, he put forward
some ideas for progress to the parties in mid-July. Subsequently, a fourth
round to discuss these ideas was held with all five States in Brussels from
5 to 12 September. Further discussions will take place in October.
Peace Implementation Council
- The Steering Board of the Peace Implementation Council continued its
monthly meetings at the level of political directors of the respective
Foreign Ministries, each devoted to specific issues of the peace process.
The discussion at the meeting in Brussels on 30 July centred on the
preparation of elections in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and also examined the
proposal for a twoyear consolidation period. The next meeting, also held
in Brussels, on 5 September, focused on the preparations for the post-
election period and endorsed the High Representative's plan of action.
Reports of the Working Groups of the International Conference on the Former
Yugoslavia were also presented. A further meeting of the Steering Board,
which will take place in my Office in Sarajevo on 2 October, will discuss
progress in the setting up of common Bosnia and Herzegovina institutions,
as well as preparations for municipal elections and results of the United
Nations International Police Task Force Donor Conference, held at Dublin on
28 September.
- In addition to the Steering Board sessions, other important
international meetings in various formats, including that of countries that
had witnessed the signing of the Peace Agreement, were taking place on a
frequent basis. OHR was represented by myself or senior members of my
staff. These meetings, some attended by delegations of Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Croatia and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, contributed to
promoting the political and other aspects of peace implementation. It is
my understanding that further meetings of this nature will take place.
- Coordination Of Civilian Implementation
Overall coordination
- Another meeting of the major implementation agencies was held at my
office in Brussels on 15 July in order to assess the efforts undertaken by
the different international agencies and organizations involved in the
implementation of the Peace Agreement. A further meeting is planned for 8
October.
- I have continued extensive consultations with representatives of
Governments and organizations. On 31 July I met the United Nations
SecretaryGeneral in New York and on the same day reported to the members of
the Security Council on the progress in the Bosnian peace implementation.
I then met with the Security Council again on 26 September. I also had
several meetings with the Chairman-in-Office of the Organization for
Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). On 7 September I addressed an
informal ministerial meeting of the European Union (EU).
- In Sarajevo, I have been convening on a regular basis principals'
meetings with the participation of the Commanders of the Implementation
Force and the Ace Rapid Reaction Corps, the Special Representative of the
United Nations Secretary-General and the Commissioner of the United Nations
International Police Task Force, the Special Envoy of the Office of the
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the OSCE Head of
Mission. These meetings have proved most helpful and effective in
coordinating efforts of the major implementation structures on the ground,
particularly in the run-up to elections.
Operational coordination
- On the ground in Bosnia the Joint Interim Commission, composed of
delegations led by the Prime Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the
Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republika Srpska and chaired
by me, in its last meeting at the beginning of July established a
Subcommittee on Preparations for the Post-Election Period (JIC-PE), in
which all three Governments are represented at ministerial level. Under my
chairmanship the Subcommittee has been meeting regularly and has dealt with
a wide range of issues concerning the political and constitutional
implementation of the Peace Agreement in the period following the 14
September elections. At these meetings many issues have been clarified
with the parties. That has contributed to shaping OHR post-election
planning.
- The Joint Civilian Commission (JCC) and the four regional Joint
Civilian Commissions (North, West, South and Sarajevo) have been meeting
periodically, chaired by my Principal Deputy, Ambassador Michael Steiner.
The JCC sessions, where Ministers of the Governments of Bosnia and
Herzegovina, and the Federation and the Republika Srpska have been sitting
together with representatives of the most important international
organizations, have dealt with a variety of practical issues concerning the
civilian implementation, including return of refugees and displaced
persons, property issues, election preparations and economic
reconstruction. The regional JCCs, bringing together representatives of
both entities' local authorities to discuss issues of particular interest
to each region, have proved to be very useful for promoting confidence
between them. All these meetings have contributed to easing possible
tensions and establishing contacts between the major factors of the
political and economic life of the country. Overall, the JCC framework,
most helpful in facilitating inter-entity confidence-building, should be
maintained for the next stage of peace implementation.
- The Joint Commissions established under the relevant Annexes of the
Peace Agreement continued their work in their respective fields.
- Activities of the Provisional Election Commission (Annex 3), chaired
by OSCE, are referred to in a subsequent section of the present report.
- The two constituent parts of the Commission on Human Rights (Annex 6)
- the Human Rights Chamber and the Ombudsperson - have been working
effectively since their establishment in late March. The Ombudsperson,
Gret Heller, has received more than 300 complaints, 10 of which have been
referred to the Human Rights Chamber. An office of the Ombudsperson was
opened in Banja Luka in July. The Human Rights Chamber has been developing
its rules of procedure, while at the same time beginning consideration of
cases. While the efforts of the Commission on Human Rights during this
start-up period are commendable, much remains to be done in establishing
the Commission as an integral part of the legal framework of Bosnia and
Herzegovina. Many if not most victims of human rights abuses in Bosnia and
Herzegovina are unaware of the new institutions that were created under the
Peace Agreement; others who have suffered abuses remain afraid to complain
or sceptical as to whether the legal system will consider their claims
fairly. At the same time, the authorities of the country have not yet put
in place the necessary framework to ensure that the institutions of the
Commission are supported in their work and that their decisions are
implemented promptly and effectively. The Commission institutions are, at
this point, funded by international donations, despite the requirement
under the Peace Agreement that expenses of the Commission be borne byBosnia and Herzegovina.
- The Commission for Real Property Claims of Displaced Persons and
Refugees (Annex 7), mandated to restore a fair and just system of property
rights in Bosnia and Herzegovina, has been meeting regularly to analyse
complex property laws and to establish principles for its future decisions.
On 4 September a Headquarters Agreement was signed, which gives the
Commission freedom from influence by any authority in Bosnia and
Herzegovina when performing its duties in the country. The Commission has
also begun its enormous operational task. Hundreds of thousands of claims
are expected to be received from people both within the country and abroad.
Coordinated from various field offices, mobile data-collection teams will
travel throughout the country to meet people and give them the possibility
to submit their claim. Similar systems will operate in countries abroad.
During its initial period of operation, the Commission will give priority
to the claims concerning the return of real property in its present state
and will disregard laws, regulations and rules of any date if they are
inconsistent with international human rights standards relating to
property.
- The Commission to Preserve National Monuments (Annex 8), coordinated
by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
(UNESCO), continued discussions on defining a universally acceptable
nomination form for immovable properties and working methods of the
Commission. Another issue under discussion was the establishment of the
Scientific Secretariat. A new session is planned for mid-October.
- The Commission on Public Corporations (Annex 9), chaired by the
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), has held five
sessions and set up two working groups, on electricity and railways. The
task of the working groups is to identify problems that ought to be solved
within the framework of a public commission. The public commission in
question would be the regulating agency for respective companies from both
entities addressing issues such as tariffs and norms.
Elections
- Elections at the State, entity and cantonal levels were held on 14
September. To achieve that goal, a very substantial collective effort had
been required of the international community in the preceding months. The
successful conduct of the municipal elections in Mostar on 30 June had
given an important psychological boost to the general elections. The
Provisional Election Commission (PEC) continued its work on the election
rules and on the practical aspects of the preparations. In addition, it
decided on 19 July that any political party that maintained in a party
position or function a person who was under indictment by the International
Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and who had failed to comply with an
order to appear before the Tribunal, would be deemed ineligible to
participate in the elections. While this measure was of general
application, it also represented a further step in the efforts of the
international community to ensure that Mr. Radovan Karadzic ceased to
exercise public office and to influence the election process. Also, with
my full support, the PEC on 6 August adopted a decision authorizing its
Chairman to make available the necessary facilities for the functioning of
the Open Broadcast Network. An Elections Appeals Subcommission was
established to ensure compliance with the electoral rules and regulations.
- The 14 September elections were held in a calm, orderly and dignified
manner. This was as a result of the cooperative attitude of the parties,
bolstered by the major planning effort on the part of all of the key
international agencies. These included OSCE, which played the leading
role, the United Nations Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina (UNMIBH), UNHCR
and the substantial efforts of the Implementation Force (IFOR). My Office
coordinated these efforts closely. Apart from a small number of isolated
incidents, election day was not marred by acts of violence. Similarly,
there were no serious restrictions to freedom of movement. Fewer than
expected of those citizens who had been displaced from their homes in the
territory of the Republika Srpska availed themselves of the arrangements
that had been put in place to enable them to vote in person where they had
lived in 1991.
- The conduct of the elections was monitored by a very large number of
international monitors coordinated by Eduard van Thijn in accordance with a
mandate from the Chairman-in-Office of OSCE. Mr. van Thijn issued a
preliminary statement on 16 September as well as a final statement on 24
September summing up the observations and judgements of the international
monitors. The statements of the Coordinator for International Monitoring
are enclosed herewith (see attachments I and II).
- Election results were certified by the Provisional Election
Commissions on 29 September after the Elections Appeal Subcommission had
also dealt with a large number of appeals. After careful consideration,
none of these was seen as calling into question the validity of the
elections and the results as certified by the PEC. On 30 September, the
Chairman-in-Office of OSCE informed me of the position with regard to the
certification of the election results by the PEC and also brought to my
attention the letter which he had received from the Chairman of the PEC on
this matter.
- The term of the members of the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina
had been defined in the Peace Agreement as being two years for the first
elections. The parties agreed that the terms of office of all those elected
in the first elections should be harmonized and fixed at the same duration.
It was left to the parties to determine how to implement the new
regulations before the September elections, as voters should be entitled to
know the duration of the terms of office for which they would elect
candidates. On the eve of the elections both the Parliamentary Assembly of
Bosnia and Herzegovina and that of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
adopted the necessary measures. Although the item was included in the
agenda of the National Assembly of the Republika Srpska, no decision was
taken. In order to have the matter regulated should the parties not be
able to adopt such rules in time before the elections, the PEC decided to
include the necessary provision in its own rules and regulations, and on 13
September decided that the term of office for all those to be elected on 14
September would be two years. It also decided that the terms of Municipal
Councillors, to be elected in the first elections, would expire on the same
day as the terms of all those elected on 14 September.
- Elections were not held for municipal governing authorities. The
evidence of manipulation of the voter registration option enabling refugees
to vote where they intend to live acted as a catalyst for the decision of
the Chairman of the PEC, on 27 August, to postpone the municipal elections.
These elections were not essential to the task of implementing the common
institutions, but as municipal governing bodies are an important element of
Bosnian society, elections should be held as soon as feasible. To that
end, the parties have agreed to an extension of the mandate of the PEC
until the end of 1996 and that OSCE will be engaged in the supervision of
the elections. Substantial resources from the international community,
both civilian and military, will be required so that the municipal
elections can be organized and conducted in conditions of security.
Post-election transition
- The successful conduct of elections has marked the conclusion of the
third phase of peace implementation. We are now entering the fourth, and
most sensitive, phase, which includes primarily the setting up of common
institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina and will eventually bring us to the
conclusion of the year-long mandates of the implementation agencies. It is
during this phase that the future destiny of Bosnia and Herzegovina will be
defined - either it survives as a single State consisting of two entities,
or goes down the road of partition with dire consequences for the whole
region.
- Using the final authority of the High Representative in theatre in
civilian implementation of the Peace Agreement, as stipulated in Annex 10
of the Peace Agreement and further described in the Geneva Agreed Measures
of 14 August, immediately after the preliminary election results were
announced, I publicly announced on 19 September transitional arrangements
designed to stimulate the formation of the common institutions and to avoid
the creation of a power vacuum as well as any ambiguity concerning the
continuity of the State of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Under these
arrangements, from the moment the newly elected Presidency of Bosnia and
Herzegovina assumes office upon the certification of election results, all
existing governmental bodies within the territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina
will perform their functions on a caretaker basis until they are replaced
by new bodies.
- Pending the proclamation of the final results of the voting, I have
already had meetings with the members of the newly elected Presidency.
With the results now certified, it is my intention to have the first
official meeting of the Presidency convened as soon as possible. I will
then help convene the inaugural session of the House of Representatives, to
be held jointly with the Presidency.
- In order to facilitate the proper initial functioning of the common
institutions, my Office, in collaboration with a number of international
organizations, is preparing a quick start package comprising the minimal
legislative basis for the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina to operate.
It will include, inter alia, laws covering foreign economic relations,
citizenship and passport regulations, setting up of the Central Bank of
Bosnia and Herzegovina, duration of the parliamentary mandate, immunity and
Presidency succession, as well as air traffic regulations and a draft
budget for 1997.
- The process of adapting the constitutions of the Federation of Bosnia
and Herzegovina and the Republika Srpska to the provisions of the
Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina has now almost been completed. The
Venice Commission of the Council of Europe has been studying the
constitutional amendments made by the entities so far and recommended the
further steps that were necessary. At my request, further consultations
between members of the Venice Commission and representatives of both
entities took place in Sarajevo at the end of August and proposals for
amendments were made in order to enable the entities to adopt the necessary
amendments before the September elections.
- Although the Federation Assembly has not so far been able to adopt the
proposals of the experts, the necessary changes must be made as soon as the
new Federation Assembly is convened. Shortly before the September
elections the Republika Srpska Assembly adopted a considerable number of
constitutional amendments on the basis of the recommendations made by the
Venice Commission. Although most of the provisions incompatible with the
Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina have now been deleted or amended,
there are still a few changes to be made in cases where the Republika
Srpska Assembly did not follow the recommendations of the experts. If the
Federation and Republika Srpska Assemblies do not implement the remaining
proposals of the Venice Commission, the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and
Herzegovina will have to decide whether the constitutional provisions in
question are consistent with the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Federation issues
- A fully functioning Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina remains one
of the cornerstones for the successful implementation of the General
Framework Agreement. For this reason OHR efforts, in conjunction with
efforts of some Governments, have continued with the aim of supporting the
establishment of functioning Federation structures.
- In general, these efforts have been hampered by the different
procedural approaches of the Federation partners. Concerning the
dissolution of existing administrative arrangements in the territory under
the control of the Croatian Defence Council (HVO), namely, the "Croat
Republic of Herzeg-Bosna", and parallel establishment of Federation
structures, and merging of institutions of the former Republic of Bosnia
and Herzegovina into Federation structures. In a number of substantial
policy areas, this difference in approach has led to a stalemate in the
establishment of Federation structures. An area of special concern for the
OHR is the facilitation of an agreement between the Federation partners
concerning the future organizational structure of Sarajevo.
- Progress in implementing the Federation clearly exists but has been
regrettably slow: the Sarajevo Agreement of 30 March 1996 resulted in the
establishment to a unified federal customs and financial system. The
Petersberg Agreement of 25 April was a decisive step towards the
establishment of new, democratic police structures in the Federation. The
Blair House Agreement of 14 May paved the way for the adoption of a
Federation Defence Law, envisaging the unification of existing defence
structures inside the Federation. The Geneva Agreed Measures of 14 August
further increased international pressure to dissolve "Herzeg-Bosna" and to
finalize the establishment of working structures within the Federation.
- The Federation partners recognize that a self-sustaining Federation is
an indispensable precondition for the successful implementation of the
Peace Agreement. Nevertheless, much groundwork remains to be done in order
to create truly stable and democratic Federation structures. OHR efforts
to facilitate further implementation of these structures will continue.
They require, however, active and increased commitment and cooperation of
the political leaders of the Federation partners.
The Inter-Entity Boundary Line and Brcko arbitration
- Building on the substantial progress achieved earlier in adjusting the
Inter-Entity Boundary Line (IEBL), on 17 July the parties signed a formal
agreement resolving most of the practical issues that had been outstanding
at the time of the signing of the Peace Agreement. Discussions continue
under IFOR auspices on the last remaining sections of the IEBL and in
particular on the sensitive Sarajevo district of Dobrinja.
- Having failed to agree by 14 July on the candidature of the third
member of the Brcko arbitration tribunal, the parties later accepted,
however, the appointment by the President of the International Court of
Justice of Robert Owen, who has since taken the Chair of the Arbitration
Tribunal. There has been no substantial progress in the arbitration
process, however, owing to the existing difference of opinion between the
parties on the object of the arbitration.
- I continue to believe that the sooner the problem is tackled by the
parties the better chance there is for a mutually acceptable negotiated
solution, which would take into account the legitimate interests of all
parties and would best serve the people of Brcko.
Media
- My Office has closely monitored the media from both entities in the
pre-election period. There has been some improvement in media access, with
somewhat more even-handed news reporting. However, most Republika Srpska
media have continued their unwavering support of the Serbian Democratic
Party (SDS), up to the exclusion of other parties. In the part of the
Federation under the control of the HVO the media have been unremittingly
biased towards the ruling HDZ party, and there has also been a tendency on
the part of Bosnia and Herzegovina television to favour the governing Party
of Democratic Action (SDA).
- The OHR has played its part in advising and sometimes warning about
inadequacies and abuses in election coverage through the OSCE Media Experts
Commission (MEC). Some cases have been raised and acted upon by the MEC.
In the case of some particularly flagrant abuses, I have raised these
directly with political authorities.
- The Open Broadcast Network (OBN), in which the OHR played a leading
role, began operation on 7 September, broadcasting news, entertainment and
electionrelated material. The purpose of OBN, funded by a wide variety of
international donors and currently operating under the authority of the PEC
in the absence of relevant legislation, is to create a strong independent
television sector in Bosnia, building on existing stations and drawing on
talents from both entities. The OBN signal can now be picked up in all
major population centres in the country.
Return of refugees and displaced persons
- More than half of the population of Bosnia and Herzegovina were
displaced as an aim and a result of the war. More than 1 million refugees
are still living outside the country and close to 1 million displaced
persons remain forced to live away from their homes within the confines of
Bosnia and Herzegovina. To implement the right to return to homes of
origin, Annex 7 of the General Framework Agreement calls upon the parties
to reverse the goals of a war characterized by campaigns of ethnic
cleansing. Thus, this element of peace implementation has to be addressed
by strenuous efforts.
- Ongoing efforts in this area are being hampered by a segregationist
reality on the ground. Arbitrary practices disrupting many fields relevant
to a civic society, acute deficits in the rule of law, the prevailing fear
of the vast majority of citizens to move out of the perceived protection in
areas of own ethnic dominance, in addition to the lack of housing space and
employment opportunities, still prevent return. This does not only stand
against return across the IEBL, but also across the ethnic division lines
within the territory of the Federation. In violation of the obligation of
the parties under the Peace Agreement to create political, social and
economic conditions for return, the continued blocking even of the re-
establishment of telecommunications, railway and commercial bus links
across the IEBL, constitutes a major deterrent to the exercise of the right
to return and to economic rehabilitation.
- The summer months have seen the return of numerous refugees and
displaced persons to areas of own ethnic dominance, boosting the total
number of returnees since the signing of the Dayton Agreement to an
estimated 200,000. Organized repatriation made up for only a small
proportion of such return movements, which are in general individual,
voluntary and spontaneous. On a small scale, so-called "minority return"
is also happening, albeit to more tolerant communities, overwhelmingly in
the Federation, or in the course of housing reconstruction programmes in
the Zone of Separation. On the other hand, the social costs of perpetuated
displacement are becoming more visible in neighbourhoods disrupted by the
advent of displaced persons from other social backgrounds.
- UNHCR, as the operational lead agency for the implementation of Annex
7, has concentrated its efforts on targeted housing reconstruction and on
confidence-building measures. My Office has supported these steps, in
particular within the instruments of the JCC framework. The coming months
will require sustained, and even increased, international support to the
housing reconstruction programmes, as well as innovative steps to promote
so-called minority return, currently under consideration. The task to make
return to homes of origin a reality will require a comprehensive and
interdisciplinary approach within the framework of further stabilization
efforts. Additional challenges, resulting from unwillingness on the part
of displaced persons and refugees to return to areas in which they would
constitute a minority, will also have to be addressed.
Missing persons; mass graves
- National authorities working with representatives of the international
community have proceeded with their efforts to assist the families of the
missing to determine the fate of the missing and, when necessary, to
retrieve and identify their mortal remains. Under the chairmanship of the
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), the Working Group on
Missing Persons has brought representatives of the families of the missing
into direct contact with the accountable authorities, thereby ensuring that
the concerns of the families are heard and answers given to their requests.
This is a difficult and lengthy process that is, unfortunately, proceeding
slowly.
- The Expert Group on Exhumation and Missing Persons, chaired by my
Office, has been assisting the parties in their efforts to carry out
exhumations and identification of mortal remains. As a result, the parties
have developed a priority list of sites to be excavated. Two of the three
sites of highest priority have been completely excavated and work is under
way on the third site. The parties are now in the process of developing a
second list of priority sites. An ante mortem database is being
established as a cooperative project of the United Nations Expert on
Missing Persons, ICRC, Physicians for Human Rights and the Boltzman
Institute. The efforts of the parties and the international community
continue, however, to be hampered by insufficient resources. The United
Nations Expert on Missing Persons is continuing his fund-raising campaign
to address such critical needs as demining assistance and forensic and
scientific supplies and equipment.
Human rights
- Respect for human rights and the rule of law are critical to the peace
implementation process. Despite commitments to uphold the highest
standards of human rights protections, all parties have consistently failed
to honour this obligation. Since my last report (see S/1996/542), the
human rights situation has deteriorated in several important areas.
Particularly troubling has been the increase in number and extent of human
rights violations committed by police and other persons in positions of
authority, as well as a substantial number of violations in the context of
elections, motivated by political belief rather than ethnicity.
- At the same time, authorities have failed to take concrete steps to
rectify conditions that threaten the goal of a multi-ethnic society.
Harassment of ethnic minorities, including forced evictions and
intimidation, continues and responsible authorities have failed to act
decisively to address this problem, as evidenced, for example, by the
ongoing threats to minority residents of the Sarajevo suburbs.
Discrimination against ethnic minorities in the field of employment,
education and access to government services is widespread, supporting the
trend towards ethnic separation.
- Crimes against the person, especially physical mistreatment of persons
by the police, are on the rise. Since my last report, all too common
incidents of beatings in custody have been joined by two murders, one
involving apparent torture by police officials and the other brought by
beating in police custody. Although increasing numbers of persons
throughout Bosnia and Herzegovina have exercised their right to freedom of
movement, many do so at the risk of harassment, arbitrary detention and
mistreatment by local authorities near the IEBL. In the context of the
elections, these problems took on new dimensions. Candidates and supporters
of opposition political parties were subjected to harassment, intimidation
and violent attacks in both entities. Local authorities, including police,
failed to counteract these threats and sometimes were in fact the
perpetrators of the abuses.
- In the area of legal reform, neither entity has fully complied with
the requirements of the Peace Agreement. While some progress has been made
in bringing the Federation and Bosnia and Herzegovina amnesty laws into
compliance with the Peace Agreement, initiatives undertaken by my Office
and others within the international community concerning shortcomings in
the Republika Srpska law on that subject have not yet yielded satisfactory
results.
- Of particular concern is the failure by the parties to address
property statutes, which present a significant barrier to return of
refugees and displaced persons. The parties have so far failed to fulfil
their obligation to suspend enforcement of laws that have been determined
to be in non-compliance with the Peace Agreement and to introduce
legislative changes necessary to allow refugee return and protect property
rights. Failure to take immediate action to address this fundamental issue
may solidify the results of ethnic cleansing.
- The parties must take immediate and concrete steps to implement the
full range of rights afforded to all persons under the Constitution of
Bosnia and Herzegovina. In particular, the parties must investigate and
prosecute persons responsible for committing human rights violations,
particularly in cases with tacit or active involvement of local police or
other officials. In addition, the parties must take concrete steps to
eliminate discrimination against ethnic minorities and returning refugees
and displaced persons, which is a necessary component in creating a
functioning multi-ethnic society.
- In this respect Sarajevo remains an object of special concern.
Through the Joint Civilian Commission for Sarajevo (JCCS), my Office
continued pursuing the goal of ensuring that the city retains its
multicultural and multi-ethnic character. This requires improving
conditions of security and access to housing and employment for all those
who live in the region, including the remaining Serb population, and
encouraging the return of those who left. We have initiated community
dialogues to improve cooperation between groups in areas where security
concerns have been especially acute. We have also initiated meetings
between mayors from both entities. Local authorities agreed at the latest
session of the JCCS, held on 27 August, to address unresolved problems
regarding integration of Serb teachers, students and health workers into
the Federation system, as well as to redouble crime prevention efforts. In
addition, my Office has helped mediate efforts to reach an agreement on a
new constitution for the Sarajevo canton, which, when implemented, will
ensure a full measure of political participation by all groups in the
community, including their representation in legislative and administrative
bodies.
- Overall, my Office, in cooperation with local actors and the
international community, continues to work continuously to strengthen the
institutional responses for redress of human rights violations.
Ultimately, however, an improvement in the human rights climate is the
responsibility of the authorities and the citizens of Bosnia and
Herzegovina. In this, the political leadership is also obliged to support
and foster the development of both the formal human rights institutions
that were established by the Peace Agreement and Federation Constitutions,
and the informal non-governmental structures that are an integral part of
the development of civil society.
Detention issues and cooperation with the International Tribunal for the
Former Yugoslavia
- The effort by the international community to secure the release of
persons detained in relation to the conflict as required under Annex 1A
remains incomplete. Although all ICRC-registered prisoners have been
released, there is evidence that the parties continue to detain an unknown
number of persons arrested prior to 19 December 1995 who have not been
registered by ICRC. Despite sustained pressure by my office, the parties
have failed to implement the "rules of the road" agreed to in Rome on 18
February, and arrests of persons alleged by the parties to have committed
war crimes continue to occur, although at a reduced level.
- In addition, the war-time practice of exchange of detained persons
continues. The risk of arrest, which is compounded by the lack of clarity
on who is being sought for war crimes, substantially impedes freedom of
movement.
- Neither entity has fully complied with its obligation to cooperate
with the International Tribunal. The authorities of Republika Srpska have
made no effort to fulfil their obligations to arrest persons indicted by
the Tribunal as required by the Peace Agreement. While authorities of the
Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina have complied by arresting indicted
persons on the territory controlled by the Bosnian Army, persons indicted
by the Tribunal who reside in or visit areas under the control of the HVO
have not been arrested and transferred to custody of the Tribunal as
required under Security Council resolution 827 (1993).
- Following the handing over by Radovan Karadzic of his functions of
President of the Republika Srpska on 30 June, further international
pressure led to his resignation from the post of Chairman of the Serb
Democratic Party and effective withdrawal from public view. However, the
issue of his appearance before the Tribunal in The Hague to defend himself
remains open.
- Cooperation by the Republika Srpska with the International Tribunal on
more technical issues has in the meantime improved. Its authorities have
agreed to serve arrest warrants on indicted persons within their
jurisdiction, and exhumations by the Tribunal in the Republika Srpska have
proceeded without hindrance. A Tribunal office has opened in Belgrade.
While Federation authorities have generally cooperated with the Tribunal,
within the last few weeks there have been troubling exceptions. Trials of
suspected war criminals began in Federation courts without proper
notification of the Tribunal; in one instance, a conviction occurred
without the Tribunal having had any opportunity to review the case.
Economic reconstruction
- Economic revival and long-term rebuilding of the economy remain major
preconditions for peace and economic stability. Much work has already been
done to restore economic infrastructure after the ravages of war and to
provide a sound basis for a return to prosperity. I have continued my
efforts in this task with major economic implementation agencies, namely,
the World Bank, the European Commission, EBRD, the International Monetary
Fund (IMF) and the International Management Group. Regular meetings on a
weekly basis have been held in Sarajevo with these agencies to discuss and
coordinate plans and to establish priorities.
- Thirteen sectoral task forces have been established jointly by the
European Commission and the World Bank to coordinate the donor efforts in
respective fields. The task forces bring together the most important
donors as well as the representatives of the beneficiaries to discuss
project implementation, to identify financing gaps and to discuss sectoral
development. In order to increase the efficiency of the task forces,
measures have now been taken to restructure the task force format to some
extent. The restructured task forces will address issues concerning policy
development and increase project implementation monitoring. The task
forces report to the OHR.
- Project implementation has picked up during the last three months and
relevant implementation structures have been set up. However, this mainly
applies to the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina as the Republika Srpska
has to a certain extent been overlooked by the international community and
has itself tended to continue its somewhat reluctant attitude towards
cooperation with the international donor community. Some positive
development has, however, taken place in the Republika Srpska as the
respective authorities agreed in the summer to sign three subsidiary loan
agreements with the State of Bosnia and Herzegovina on World Bank projects,
thus opening the door for participation in these programmes.
- According to the latest statistics, firm donor commitments for 1996
add up to US$ 1,520 million. The total amount under different stages of
implementation is $880 million, of which $558 million has been disbursed.
The Federation territory has received 82 per cent of the total assistance
efforts under implementation, while 17 per cent represent activities of an
inter-entity nature. Only 1 per cent of the total activities are under
implementation in the Republika Srpska. Even in the Federation the
assistance efforts have so far concentrated on few areas, where only two
cantons and Sarajevo have received two thirds of the total. In the future
this tendency must be reversed and a more balanced approach must be
obtained both concerning the Federation territory and the Republika Srpska,
considering the degree of damage, needs and political conditionality.
- Within the framework of reforms that facilitate economic recovery and
transition of Bosnia and Herzegovina to a market economy, I have stressed
certain priority sectors such as infrastructure, employment generation and
restart of production. Some positive examples can be mentioned:
rehabilitation of rail tracks between Sarajevo and Ploce, rehabilitation of
three principal power plants and four main transmission lines, and picking
up of small-scale commerce. However, the speed of implementation has very
often been slower than expected and serious financing gaps still exist in
all priority areas. I strongly encourage the donor community to make good
on pledges announced and to accelerate procurement activity in order to
take full advantage of the remaining construction season of 1996. I would
also like to point out that regrettably too often political constraints on
the ground have either slowed down or totally hampered the speed of
implementation, and subsequently the lack of basic infrastructure, for
instance of an adequate telecommunications system, effectively prevents
economic cooperation from taking place between the entities. I have made
it very clear that these tendencies cannot continue.
- Preparations for the next stage of recovery have been started. The
major tasks to be addressed in the post-election phase of Bosnia and
Herzegovina's economic development include, inter alia, rapid installation
of State institutions, implementation of sound macroeconomic policies,
adoption of a legislative framework conducive to the transition to a market
economy and continuing the reconstruction efforts. The success of these
efforts depends on close cooperation among the major international
implementation agencies.
Mine clearance
- Progress with the physical removal of mines remains slow, but
clearance of some roads, airports, war graves and resettlement areas has
been completed and more is under way. The first World Bank pilot contracts
have been placed and the Republika Srpska has belatedly accepted World Bank
credits.
- Since I last reported (see S/1996/542), considerable progress has
been made with organization and training. The United Nations Mine Action
Centre in Sarajevo has been recruiting more international and local staff,
a regional office has been established in Banja Luka, the national
electronic minefield database has been installed, maps have been issued and
mine-awareness training continues. To date, some 60 mine survey
specialists have been trained, Norwegian Peoples Aid has trained over 120
mine clearers and EU has placed contracts for the training of a total of
200 mine survey and explosive ordnance disposal specialists. The expanded
United States Government programme of training and mine clearing is under
way.
- However, much remains to be done. Lack of freedom of movement
continues to restrict training and local involvement in management.
Funding falls short of that required and the Federation authorities'
insistence on levying some 50 per cent tax and social security charges,
which they are unable to audit, on the salaries of local staff has delayed
the finalization of some projects. There is also concern that after the
winter period there will be a lack of mineclearing capacity to deal with
the task in 1997.
- In order to address these problems, the Mine Clearance Task Force
under the Chairmanship of the Deputy Special Representative of the United
Nations Secretary-General has been restructured. This group will now
oversee the activity of the United Nations Mine Action Centre and establish
policy, determine priorities and seek funding for mine clearing. This Task
Force will subsume the Mine Clearance Policy Group activity. It is hoped
that the newly elected Government will be more ready to cooperate than has
been the case to date. This will be essential if the United Nations
proposal to train and equip up to 2,000 mine clearers before April 1997,
and possibly employ this work force during the 1997 mine clearing season,
is to become reality.
Regional stabilization
- Implementation of the Agreement on Subregional Arms Control pursuant
to Article 4 of Annex 1B of the Peace Agreement, which was signed in
Florence on 14 June, has so far gone according to schedule. The baseline
validation period inspections began on 18 August. To date, 25 inspections
have been conducted out of the total of 96 to be carried out before the end
of the validation period on 31 October. OSCE has reported some
difficulties with regard to the definition of points of entry between the
parties on the territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which have somewhat
disrupted initial planning. Otherwise, the inspections have gone on
unhindered.
- The parties have notified their reduction liabilities and are expected
to start their reductions of stockpiles of armaments covered by the above
Agreement by mid-October. OSCE is providing assistance to the parties in
the implementation of their obligations.
- The OSCE Special Representative, who is to assist the parties by
helping organize and conduct negotiations on regional arms control
envisaged in Article 5 of Annex 1B, is expected to be appointed by the time
of the OSCE summit in early December, thus opening the way for substantial
negotiations between the Parties concerned.
- Cooperation With The Implementation Force
- Relations with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)-led
Implementation Force (IFOR) have continued to be most constructive. During
this phase, military support to civilian agencies has increased. This
contribution has been vital to progress in most aspects of civilian
activity and the support to the OSCE election management has been essential
and extensive. Without this support the elections could not have taken
place. Procedures for the emergency protection of civilians have been
refined.
- At the strategic level, I have maintained close contact with the NATO
Secretary-General, Mr. Javier Solana, and the Supreme Allied Commander in
Europe, General George Joulwan. I am currently discussing support during
the critical post-election phase and have written to Mr. Solana on this
subject.
- In theatre, the change of IFOR commander in July was executed without
impact on civilian implementation. I wish to record my sincere
appreciation for the excellent support I received from Admiral Leighton
Smith during a challenging time for both of us. I am pleased that this
level of support has been maintained by Admiral Joseph Lopez during his
time in command.
- The delay to the municipal elections will place additional, unexpected
demands on IFOR. We are working together closely to establish what support
is required and possible.
- Looking Forward
- As I have stressed in my previous two reports, the fourth phase of
peace implementation this year after the elections is the most difficult
and the most decisive for the future. It is now that we have the
possibility of starting to bring the country back together again.
- The election campaigns of the different political parties have
confirmed how all of them are continuing to pursue their original long-term
national aims, thus underlining the fragility of the peace process in the
months and years ahead. Nationalist issues - both offensive and
defensive - were at the forefront of the campaigns of the major parties,
while the pressing economic and social issues of the country were sorely
neglected.
- The election results have demonstrated once more the dominant role of
the nationalist parties in all of the three ethnic communities in the
country, thus repeating the experience of the November 1990 elections.
Although conditions for these elections, especially concerning the media,
were very far from perfect, I believe that this election result does
represent the mood of the different parts of the country. These were
elections dominated much more by fears coming out of the past than by hopes
that should be generated by the future.
- The elections were the prerequisite for the full implementation of the
new Constitution, primarily the establishment of common institutions. The
future of the peace process will be determined by the success or failure in
the setting up of these elaborate power-sharing arrangements. It is only
by creating structures with which all of the country will be able to
identify that the longterm viability and stability of the country can be
secured.
- As I have noted in previous reports, the forces of ethnic separation
are still stronger than the forces of ethnic reintegration. Although
movements across the Inter-Entity Boundary Line are increasing and we are
trying to facilitate the development of a network of links between the
entities in all spheres of social, economic and political life, true signs
of ethnic reconciliation are still sorely missing. Bosnia and Herzegovina
is still a country divided into three to a very large extent separate
ethnic communities.
- The power-sharing arrangements must be fair to each and every one at
the same time as they must ensure the effective governance of the country.
The Constitution calls for a united, but not a unitary country, based on a
unique degree of decentralization of powers of the two entities - the
Federation and the Republika Srpska. The common institutions of the
country require a high degree of consensus in order to be able to work
efficiently.
- The constitutional implementation issues will dominate the coming
weeks. The Presidency has started at its first meeting to discuss the
setting up of the new Council of Ministers, with the aim of completing this
before 30 October. It will take at least as long to get both Chambers of
the Parliamentary Assembly ready to start to address all the issues that
must be urgently addressed.
- My Office is preparing a package of interim and immediate measures we
believe the common institutions must start to address as soon as they are
able to commence operation. This is also a time when it will be possible
to embark on discussions with the new common institutions on reconstruction
assistance for the coming years, thus paving the way for the holding of a
new donors' conference in the beginning of 1997.
- The coming months must also see a resolution of the issue of the IEBL
in the Brcko area. Although the Arbitration Tribunal has been set up, the
political divisions over the issue have severely hampered its work. I have
encouraged the President of the Tribunal to move forward towards a decision
by the Tribunal during the autumn in order to make implementation possible
before the arrival of winter in the area. Such a decision must be based on
the principles of the Peace Agreement and take into account the fundamental
geostrategic interests of the parties in the area.
- The Provisional Election Commission has indicated that municipal
elections might be held during the month of November. These will be
important in determining the structure of local power across the country.
IFOR has declared its readiness to give these elections its security
support in the same way as for the 14 September elections. A final
decision on the timing of the municipal elections is pending.
- During the coming weeks the discussion on the future international
support that must be given to Bosnia and Herzegovina is bound to intensify.
>From my perspective, I would like to stress the need for as early and as
firm decisions on these issues as possible, since this would contribute to
the political processes now under way in the country as well as in the two
entities.
- An agreement has been secured on having new national, entity, cantonal
and local elections in all of Bosnia and Herzegovina in September 1998 and
in my view we must look at the period between now and then as a
consolidation period for the peace process, during which we must be
prepared to assist the common institutions of the country in gradually
carrying the process forward. If the consolidation period is successful,
the September 1998 elections should be dominated more by hopes for the
future than by fears from the past.
- I believe that the goals of the ambitious Peace Agreement can
gradually be achieved, but I am firmly convinced that this will not
happened without a continued commitment of support and help from the
international community during these two years. A security presence is an
unavoidable part of this commitment, since only this can take away the fear
of a conflict restarting that otherwise will seriously impair the
political, economic and social process of healing and reconciliation.
- The war crimes issue will become increasingly important during the
coming period, since any true and lasting reconciliation must be based on
bringing to justice those responsible for the atrocities of the war.
- A consolidation period for Bosnia and Herzegovina during the next two
years cannot be seen in isolation from developments in the region as a
whole. There is a very close interaction between its different parts, and
it is my conviction that only a process of integration and cooperation in
the region as a whole can create an environment in which a stable and
united Bosnia and Herzegovina can develop on its own.
- Although the normalization of relations between the Federal Republic
of Yugoslavia and Croatia represents a most important positive step, other
issues remain to be solved. The reintegration of Eastern Slavonia into
Croatia must not cause a new wave of refugees, at the same time as there is
a need for more rapid progress on refugee return to the Krajina areas of
Croatia. Failure to address these issues constructively could have a
destabilizing effect also on Bosnia.
- The peace process in Bosnia has now entered its most critical phase.
What is at stake during the weeks and months ahead is not the question of
war and peace in the short term, but the question of continued partition or
gradual reintegration. But without a gradual reintegration of the country,
the threat of a renewed conflict will always be there and the peace process
will remain extremely fragile.
OHR Report of the High
Representative Brussels, 1 October 1996
|