The winner does not take it all
By Amra Kebo
Mr. Schumacher, how do you assess the general elections in
BiH?
I think we can say they were positive. There is a clear
erosion of support for the strong mono-ethnic parties. The SDS lost five
seats in the National Assembly, and a similar thing happened in the
Federation to the SDA and the HDZ. That gives us hope for the future. The
elections have significantly strengthened the opposition, but it has to
solidify itself in the upcoming period. This is one of the reasons why High
Representative Carlos Westendorp and OSCE Mission Chief Robert Barry have
decided that the representation in the parliaments can no longer be based on
the slogan, 'The winner takes it all.' The leading majority parties will no
longer decide on their own who the delegates in the House of Peoples of the
State Parliament will be. This will be decided according to the results all
parties on the cantonal and Entity levels have achieved in general. This
means that the SDA and the HDZ, who have the majority in all cantonal
assemblies, could theoretically decide about their delegates in the House of
Peoples, but they will have to take into account the results achieved by the
other political parties in the Federation, so several seats will have to go
to the New Croat Initiative and the Croat Christian-Democratic Union, and
not to the HDZ only. The same goes for the SDA, which has to allocate
several seats in the House of Peoples to the SDP, the Democratic-National
Union and other parties. Of course, we also will not be satisfied in the RS
if only SDS delegates are in the House of Peoples. This is not possible, for
it is not based on the constitution of the RS National Assembly. We can
still see mono-ethnic parties hold a very strong position, but it is
weakening.
What do you think about the opposition in the Federation?
You can judge on the opposition only when it starts to
govern. Therefore, let us wait until the opposition takes over power in the
Federation.
Is there a need for the existence of the Alternative Council
of Ministers, considering the fact that the opposition won many more votes
than in the last elections?
An alternative cabinet exists in many western
democracies, especially in Great Britain. A shadow government is always
manned by the opposition. For any government, regardless of whether in
Bosnia, Germany or Great Britain, it is always good to have an strong
opposition. In that context, I support the idea that the parties that
currently form the Alternative Council of Ministers should carry on with
this tradition. I am ready to improve cooperation with the Alternative
Council of Ministers in order to hear their opinion about political issues
that are being solved at the state level.
The first informal meeting of the BiH Presidency was held
without any problems?
This meeting was encouraging because it was held in a
simple way and because the new Presidency members met very early and agreed
on the ceremony of taking over their duties. I think this meeting cleared a
very important matter: the building in Marijin Dvor will be the permanent
seat of the BiH joint institutions, as stated in the Bonn and the Luxembourg
documents. This means that the plenary sessions of the CoM, the Parliament
and the Presidency will be held in the Marijin Dvor building. When the
European Union project is implemented, which means equipping and furbishing
all offices that have been reconstructed, the offices of the CoM Secretary
General, the Parliamentary Secretariat, and the cabinet of the Serb
presidency member Zivko Radisic including his staff will be located there.
This will be the end of the habit to hold meetings in the National Museum
and in Lukavica.
Is the first session of the newly elected BiH Parliament
going to be held in the new building?
The BiH Parliament could hold a session in this very
building tomorrow if necessary. Of course, we need at least 24 hours in
order to put chairs in the conference room, and the rest of the furniture
will arrive in two months. The EU assured us that the conference room will
be finished by the end of the year.
What is the situation in the RS like?
I think that neither the "Sloga" Coalition nor we need to
be discouraged by the election results. Poplasen won and we have to respect
that. We have made it clear that we respect the election results, but we
also have to look at them from the point of view that the "Sloga" coalition
has won more seats in the Parliament than it had before. Now it is like a
game of chess. Poplasen has to make the first move and propose a government
mandator. We encourage and call on the parties of the "Sloga Coalition"
(Plavsic, Radisic and his colleague Ilic, and Dodik) to stick together and
preserve the Coalition they signed. For, nothing can happen against the will
of "Sloga", and this should be the guideline for the future policy in the
RS. Until the new prime minister is elected, Dodik's government will stay in
power.
When will the new RS Prime Minister be elected?
I do not want to speculate with names. We should wait.
Was Dragan Cavic's removal a warning to Poplasen and all
other officials who work against Dayton?
The HR's decision to remove Dragan Cavic, designated
president of the parliamentary SDS fraction, shows our insistence that the
newly elected officials must respect the Dayton Agreement. Cavic's
statements on threats to the international community are clearly offensive
and unacceptable and are not in accordance with the principles that he
agreed to abide by when he registered for the elections. No one should be
surprised that Carlos Westendorp took this decision.
Could this act be considered a warning to hard-liners
across the political landscape?
No. Please, take this as a warning to all those who wish
to challenge the High Representative in his intention to implement the
Dayton Peace Agreement.
Talking about Dayton, we recently saw a similar
provocation in Tasovcici, where one man lost his life.
I truly hope that the people who simply want to return to
their homes will be able to do so freely. Regarding Tasovcici, IPTF has
taken measures and removed the Capljina Chief of Police, Buntic. IPTF
demanded from the Minister of Internal Affairs, Valentin Coric, who still
holds this position, to remove Buntic from his post immediately. In
addition, a criminal investigation and disciplinary measures were initiated.
Apart from that, Sir Martin Garrod organized a meeting in Mostar at which
representatives of both sides agreed how to keep the situation in Tasovcici
under control, and to continue with returns. I think that the good will
shown by both parties at this meeting is encouraging.
Should Ivan Prskalo still become Deputy Mayor of Mostar
after this event?
The public fight that Ivan Prskalo started earlier with
representatives of the international community does not help solving all the
numerous problems in Mostar. When it comes to the new leadership in Mostar,
I would still recommend to wait for the meeting of the local politicians
there, who should decide who will remain in office and who not.
Before the elections, HDZ leaders committed themselves to
Dayton. The situation is now different?
Although a returnee lost his life before politicians came
to an agreement, I am still encouraged by the good faith shown by both sides
in Tasovcici, as well as by all the assurances given by HDZ representatives
after the incident. I see a clear intention to calm down the situation in
Tasovcici, as well as active support for continuing returns. We have
experienced this already in Vitez with Bosniak returns to Ahmici and Gacice.
I think it is important to show Croats that the international community
works by the principle of equal rights. The examples of returns to Vitez,
Busovaca, Brajkovici and Bukovica show that we take both Bosniak and Croat
interests into account. I wish to convey to everybody that they should have
confidence in both sides and actively support the process of return. Now,
after the elections, we are on the threshold: we can no longer micromanage
20,30 families in individual municipalities, as this absorbs the energy of
the international community in an irresponsible way. We need a clear
commitment from the highest leaders that they are in favor of return. On the
other hand, the international community has to improve its models of
cooperation. I would like to point out that so far, return has happened
successfully in the Vrbas Valley, between Bugojno, Jajce and Gornji Vakuf,
where there is excellent cooperation between SFOR troops and the authorities
for civilian implementation. This blueprint should also be applied in other
areas of the Federation and in the Republika Srpska. In that regard, I
expect better cooperation in the future.
|