|
Mr. Mirsad Kebo
Minister for Human Rights and Refugees
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Mr. Ramiz Mehmedagić
Minister for Urban Planning and Environment
Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Mr. Jasmin Samardžić
Minister for Displaced Persons and Refugees
Republika Srpska
Mr. Edin Musić
Minister for Social Policy, Refugees and Displaced Persons
Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Mr. Siniša Kisić
Mayor
Brčko District
Dear Sirs,
We are writing to present the international community’s criteria for a joint
approach to case-by-case certification of substantial completion of property law
implementation by municipalities in BiH. As you are aware, an increasing number
of municipalities in BiH have resolved all claims pending before them and we
expect all municipalities to have done so by the end of this year. Given the
importance of ensuring that our assessments of municipal completion are as
accurate as possible, we have drawn up the enclosed “PLIP Municipal Guidelines
for Substantial Completion of Property Law Implementation”. We propose that they
be put before the State Commission on Refugees for discussion and endorsement,
and welcome your comments or proposals on how the current guidelines might be
improved.
The enclosed guidelines reflect the current expectations of the international
community in terms of the minimum criteria for completion. They are based on
ongoing consultative field application in some municipalities. Substantial
completion of property law implementation is achieved when the competent
authorities have resolved all pending property cases in their jurisdiction and
have planned for all ongoing and future obligations, such as the processing of
future claims and the provision of alternative accommodation to those who remain
entitled.
While the guidelines focus on tasks within the competence of the
administrative bodies directly responsible for property law implementation,
there are a number of other issues that affect the ability of refugees and
displaced persons to repossess and dispose over their property. These
issues need to be fully addressed and include:
1. Implementation of legal provisions on decision and review procedures
regarding concluded and/or revalidated contracts on use;
2. Compliance with legal regulations ensuring non-discriminatory purchase of
socially-owned apartments by refugees and displaced persons;
3. Assessment of the housing stock in the municipality administered in
accordance with the laws and measures for (1) emergency accommodation to remain
available for those entitled to it, subject to systematic checks of ongoing
eligibility, and (2) surplus facilities, wherever appropriate, to be made
available for use as alternative accommodation in the same municipality or as
either form of temporary accommodation for nearby municipalities;
4. Assessment of number of persons in the municipality likely to remain
unable to provide for their own housing needs over the long-term and analysis of
possible long-term housing solutions for social cases in accordance with the
relevant laws;
5. Assessment of number and status of court cases for the repossession of
property in the municipality in question filed prior to the entry into force of
the administrative property repossession laws in 1998; support for rapid
resolution of this caseload.
Finally, related to point 5 of the guidelines, we would like to remind you of
the suggestion made in the 20 March 2003 letter on social welfare policy sent by
OHR, OSCE and UNHCR regarding unclaimed apartments. The letter suggested that
there were reasons to reconsider the automatic return of these apartments to
allocation right holders in every case. The recommendation was made to the
competent Ministries in both Entities to issue interim instructions setting out
procedures by which such apartments would remain available for use as
alternative accommodation.
We also wish to reiterate our expectation that maximum use be made of
unclaimed apartments in support of property law implementation. The same
principle clearly applies to all other forms of surplus alternative
accommodation in municipalities completing property law implementation. Although
the end of the process is near, an urgent and continuing need remains in both
Entities for accommodation for persons who are evicted and are unable to house
themselves. In some areas of BiH, the competent municipal authorities have
already made arrangements for “sharing” alternative accommodation at a local
level.
We look forward to your comments on these guidelines, with a view to rapid
completion of property law implementation throughout Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Sincerely,
Peter Bas-Backer
Deputy High Representative
For Reconstruction and Return
On behalf of PLIP agencies
|