|
Political Directors of the Peace Implementation Council Steering Board
(PIC SB) met in Sarajevo on 29-30 March 2011. Representatives of selected
state-level institutions participated in parts of the meeting.
This is a defining period for Bosnia and Herzegovina following the general
elections last year. New authorities are in the process of formation. There are
opportunities for progress towards European integration. The PIC SB expressed
concern that political leaders have lost focus on these opportunities. More than
fifteen years after the signature of the Dayton Agreement, the PIC SB is deeply
concerned at continuing problems in fulfilling its terms and in embedding the
rule of law in Bosnia and Herzegovina. This is the time for political leaders to
demonstrate strong qualities of realism, constructive compromise and political
will. The international community stands ready to assist in every way possible,
but the essential decisions to move forward must come from within Bosnia and
Herzegovina, from the demands of its citizens and the far-sighted actions of
their elected leaders.
The PIC SB called upon Bosnia and Herzegovina’s political leaders to engage
in a spirit of compromise to urgently agree on the formation of a broad-based
government at the state-level which will permit progress in many issues,
including addressing the outstanding urgent reforms necessary for European and
Euro-Atlantic integration.
The PIC SB called for a rapid resolution of legal questions surrounding the
creation of the new Federation government, and welcomed the High
Representative’s efforts in support of that objective.[1] The PIC SB urged parties to support a stable government
that can provide for the needs of Federation residents. The PIC SB urged all
parties and authorities to act responsibly and in line with the General
Framework Agreement for Peace (GFAP), the Constitutions and relevant laws, and
reiterated that it will not allow any actions that will undermine the
constitutional and legal order in the country. In view of announced plans for
creating an All-Croat Congress and inter-cantonal and inter-municipal bodies,
the PIC SB underlined that such actions must fully conform with the GFAP and the
Constitution. It called on the Cantons that have so far not formed the
Cantonal legislatures and have not elected delegates to the Federation House of
Peoples to do so without further delay, and the PIC SB noted that these steps
should have been completed by 2 December 2010 in accordance with the Federation
Constitution. The PIC SB remains fully committed to supporting the equal rights
of all the constituent peoples and others in Bosnia and Herzegovina in
accordance with the Dayton Constitution and law. The Steering Board noted the
aspirations, in particular, of leaders of the Croat community to seek reforms to
address perceived concerns relating to the full and equitable participation of
all constituent peoples and Others.
The PIC SB expressed its appreciation for the work and integrity of the
Central Election Commission throughout a very complex and challenging electoral
process. Its members should be praised for having maintained an independent
stance in the context of complex electoral legislation.
The PIC SB called on all authorities to ensure the proper functioning of
institutions at all levels, and it emphasized that state-level competences must
not be undermined. Equally, entity competences should continue to be fully
respected. It condemned public statements, particularly those challenging the
existence and the responsibilities of the Court and the Prosecutor’s Office of
Bosnia and Herzegovina.
The PIC SB reminded all parties of their obligation to abide by the GFAP,
which inter alia guarantees the territorial integrity and sovereignty of
Bosnia and Herzegovina. The PIC SB also noted continued negative statements and
rhetoric from some elected officials. It unequivocally condemned and rejected
all such statements, including particularly those referring to the dissolution
of the state.
The PIC SB welcomed the European Union’s decision of December 2010 to grant
visa liberalization to Bosnia and Herzegovina’s citizens. However, it expressed
concern with the lack of progress, in particular with the obligations stemming
from the Stabilisation and Association Agreement. Bosnia and Herzegovina must
take urgent steps to align its Constitution with the European Convention on
Human Rights, and adopt state-level laws on State Aid and a Population Census
for further progress on its EU integration path.
The PIC SB urged the authorities to quickly establish a transparent and
effective mechanism for developing concrete constitutional reform proposals, to
address as a matter of legal priority the discriminatory provisions identified
in the December 2009 European Court of Human Rights ruling. The PIC SB stressed
moreover the importance of improving and strengthening the efficiency and
functionality of the state institutions, including through necessary
constitutional changes, adopted in line with current constitutional provisions.
In particular, the country will need to be in a position to adopt and enforce
laws and rules of the EU in accordance with the wishes of the citizens of Bosnia
and Herzegovina.
The PIC SB welcomed that the EU is further strengthening its engagement in
Bosnia and Herzegovina. The PIC SB took note that it would do this through a
broad and balanced set of instruments. It took note of the EU’s preparations to
establish a reinforced presence, with a single EU representative in Bosnia and
Herzegovina taking the lead in supporting the country on EU related matters. The
PIC SB also welcomed the EU’s support for the GFAP and took note of the possible
use of restrictive measures in this regard. The PIC SB also took note of the
EU’s views that the CSDP missions, namely the EU Police Mission and EUFOR
Operation Althea, are important elements of the EU’s overall strategy for Bosnia
and Herzegovina and will be kept under regular review on the basis of the
situation on the ground.
The PIC SB called on Bosnia and Herzegovina to meet those outstanding
objectives and conditions from the 5+2 agenda, completion of which remains
necessary for the closure of the Office of the High Representative.It is the
responsibility of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s political leaders to build consensus
and reach agreements necessary to fulfill these objectives and conditions.
In particular, the PIC SB reiterated that there is a need for a resolution of
the apportionment of state and defence property agreed between state and entity
governments. It took note that in addition to blocking the transition of the
Office of the High Representative, failure to resolve this issue impedes Bosnia
and Herzegovina’s ability to meet the criteria for Euro-Atlantic integration and
creates an atmosphere of legal ambiguity.
The PIC SB urged the relevant State and Entity authorities to
complete their assessments of current and future state property
needs, which should then serve as the basis for an agreement
on their respective ownership rights.The PIC SB expressed concern over
recent initiatives by Republika Srpska which aim to unilaterally determine the
ownership of state property. It stressed that the Republika Srpska
authorities must fully comply with the High Representative’s order of January
2011[2], and that they must
respect the forthcoming Decision of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s Constitutional
Court regarding state property legislation.
Regarding defence property, the PIC SB encouraged the parties to place a
priority on concluding an agreement, in line with the BiH Law on
Defence, on immovable property required for future defence purposes. The
NATO members of the PIC SB and Japan underlined that this property will be
registered in the ownership of Bosnia and Herzegovina for use by the Ministry of
Defence. This would enable the start of the country’s NATO Membership Action
Plan. Finally, while the PIC SB praised the recent presidential decision
requesting immediate suspension of weapons and military equipment export
licenses from BiH, the authorities need to improve their efforts in destroying
excess weapons, ammunition and explosives.
The PIC SB welcomed the contributions of the Office of the High
Representative and the European Commission in resolving the Brcko electricity
issue to the benefit of the citizens of Brcko. It anticipates the prospect of
being informed soon of the recommendations of the Supervisor and the High
Representative on closure of the Brcko Arbitral Tribunal, which would allow the
PIC SB to take a decision about the closure of the Brcko Supervision. The PIC SB
reminds the entities of the important and binding obligations arising from the
Brcko Final Award and the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
The PIC SB underlined the importance of freedom of expression and free and
independent media, including appropriate oversight bodies and regulatory
mechanisms. In this regard, it expressed its strong support to the
Communications Regulatory Agency. It called on the authorities to ensure that
journalists are able to operate without harassment. It urged all media to report
objectively and in line with the highest international standards.
The PIC SB reiterated its support for the work of the BiH Missing Persons
Institute (MPI) and its concern over efforts underway to obstruct or delay the
work of the MPI. It called on all relevant authorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina
to ensure that the MPI and its staff and families are afforded their full
protection and support.
The PIC Steering Board recalled that the UNHCR-endorsed Revised Strategy for
the Implementation of Annex VII of the General Framework Agreement for Peace
(Dayton Agreement) was adopted by the BiH Parliament in June 2010 and still
awaits implementation. Political discussions and negotiations should not
distract attention from the urgent need for the Strategy's implementation and
translation into durable solutions for the remaining 113,000 displaced people in
the country.
The PIC SB recalled that the fight against corruption and organised crime
must be addressed as a matter of priority. A consistent track record of
proactive investigations and prosecutions at all level is a key challenge. In
this respect, it took note of recent law enforcement operations which led to the
arrest of a large number of people suspected of links with organised crime
networks, in conjunction with customs fraud, money laundering, aggravated theft
and the forging of documents. The PIC SB called on competent judicial
institutions to guarantee a proper follow up.
The PIC SB repeated its call to the authorities of Bosnia and Herzegovina to
continue to cooperate fully with the ICTY, and to fulfill their obligations
under international law to arrest and transfer all fugitive ICTY indictees – in
particular Ratko Mladic – and to dismantle fugitives’ support networks. It
stressed that BiH officials at every level must fully comply with efforts by
domestic judicial and law enforcement institutions to bring to justice
individuals who committed war crimes. The PIC SB reaffirmed that genocide in
Srebrenica, war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in the course of
the conflict in BiH must not be forgotten or denied.
The PIC SB encouraged the intensification of regional cooperation and
reconciliation in the context of a wider reform agenda driven by EU Integration.
Reconciliation efforts should include a more forward-looking and integrating
approach to education by all the relevant authorities in BiH.
The PIC SB urged the relevant authorities to adopt the Global Fiscal
Framework for 2011-2013 without delay, and in this regard it particularly
emphasized the need to ensure sufficient revenues for and thus effective
functioning of the state-level institutions. The PIC SB also called on the
authorities to strengthen fiscal coordination by ensuring the proper functioning
of the Indirect Taxation Authority and its bodies as well as the BiH Fiscal
Council, and called on competent authorities to adopt all measures that can
ensure their proper functioning.
The PIC SB underlined its strong commitment to Bosnia and Herzegovina’s
territorial integrity and sovereignty. The PIC SB reiterated its full support
for the High Representative and his authority derived from Annex 10 of the GFAP
and relevant UN Security Council Resolutions, it insisted on full compliance
with the GFAP, all its annexes, and the Decisions of the High Representative,
and reminded the authorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina to ensure that the High
Representative and his Office have access to officials, institutions and
documents in a timely fashion.
The PIC SB supports the engagement of EUFOR and NATO in relation to the
Inter-Entity Boundary Line (IEBL). It reminded the parties that Annex 2 of the
GFAP provides for the procedures to adjust if necessary the IEBL. These
procedures must be complied with.
The next PIC SB meeting will be held in Sarajevo on 6-7 July 2011.
[1] The Russian Federation did
not support the High Representative’s Decision of 27 March 2011 to suspend the
Decisions of the BiH Central Election Commission.
[2] The Russian Federation did
not support the High Representative’s Decision of 5 January 2011.
|