|
This is not the end of changes to the unusual setup of
BiH - By refraining from voting, the SDA showed it was wrong – You have so
many levels of government that it is questionable whether you can afford it
The Sarajevo Agreement on implementation of the Constitutional Court’s
decision on the constituent status of peoples on the whole territory of BiH will
be implemented by the end of this year – High Representative Wolfgang Petritsch
expects.
The man who primarily receives all praise and criticism with regard to the
achieved agreement and solutions arising from it emphasizes for “Dnevni Avaz”
that he was often exposed to different proposals by local politicians during the
negotiations on the manner of implementation of the Constitutional Court’s
decision.
Notion of democracy
I didn’t give way, always having before me the interest of improvement in
BiH, Petritsch says.
DA: Some critics claim that these changes almost cement the situation
created by war, especially on the territory of the RS, and that there are no
more changes to the still pretty grotesque constitutional and legal system of
BiH.
WP: That’s a pretty wrong notion of democracy.
Democracy means a negotiating process and agreement founded on the constitution
and legal framework through which the system can be changed. This,
therefore, is neither the beginning nor the end of changes to this pretty unique
system, which is incomparable to any other state in Europe. All BiH
citizens didn’t have the same rights on the whole territory of the country and
we’ve seen to it that this Agreement changes that for the better.
DA: The changes we’re talking about have been presented to the RS public
as a defense of the RS. This Entity, RS politicians are saying, has been
defended. How do you respond to these allegations?
WP: We are witnesses to intensive political rhetoric that we
can listen to every day here. Some RS politicians wanted to forcefully
defend some principles here, but they realized they had to go pretty far from
them in order for this compromise to be made. Also, it’s normal that every party
is now trying to present these amendments the way it suits them best. I,
of course, wouldn’t give this a particularly high profile. And this, by
the way, isn’t only characteristic of the RS, but it could also be heard across
BiH.
DA: The SDA criticizes the Agreement very strongly, presenting a whole
series of specific faults. How do you respond to their claims?
WP: The SDA must defend their positions and justify the
premature walk-out from the negotiations. It’s obvious that the SDA
realized they’d made a mistake walking out and are now trying to cover it up.
SDA – abstention
DA: They don’t behave at all the way you’re suggesting.
WP: You’re wrong. By abstaining from voting, the SDA
showed they were wrong, but they didn’t find the strength to come back to the
process. They turned from the Party of Democratic Action into the Party of
Democratic Abstention. But, I do appreciate Mr Tihic’s announcement that they
would support the implementation of the Agreement.
DA: Again, it doesn’t appear like abstention. The SDA has already
announced several initiatives to review the Agreement and possibly institute new
proceedings before the Constitutional Court of BiH.
WP: They are all legitimate means they can use and no one
with a democratic orientation stands against it. But this doesn’t hide the fact
that the SDA made a political mistake.
DA: After the SDA and the HDZ behaved the way they did in the Federation
Parliament, do you consider these two parties the IC’s partners or not?
WP: I think these parties have isolated themselves alone.
They are now in isolation and that’s where they’re going to stay. To get
out of this self-isolation, they must move and come out into the centre of
activity in order to become political partners.
DA: This means you aren’t going to be in touch with them?
WP: No. By declining to take part in the process,
these parties have become politically irrelevant. The Steering Board of
the PIC has also expressed regret over the behaviour of the SDA and the HDZ, but
appeals to all parties to take a constructive part in the implementation of the
amendments. This was my expectation, too. This appeal refers also to
the SDA and the HDZ. But, it’s up to them to prove that they accept these
new changes after the voting.
New changes
DA: One of the big questions we’re dealing with now is about the
powers of the RS vice-presidents.
WP: The Constitutional Court’s decision didn’t refer to the
powers of the president and vice-presidents, nor was the definition of that a
part of the Agreement. This issue must be solved after the
elections. However, what’s important now is the fact that the three of
them have the legitimacy because they are elected directly, though it’s clear
that the RS president and vice-presidents have different powers than is the case
with the Federation presidency system. I think this issue needs to be
addressed.
Personally, I believe it’s much more necessary to work on the reduction of
the government apparatus in the Entities.
DA: Does that mean that you also advocate the abolition of the Entity
presidencies?
WP: No. Privately, I believe that one of the first next
moves by leading political groups in the country could be to consider in which
way they can reduce the political apparatus in the whole country. You have
so many levels of government that it’s really questionable whether you can
afford it? Of course this now goes out of the frame in which we are talking.
DA: You specified deadlines that some changes in the Federation must be
put into practice during the next nine months. How to meet them?
WP: Yes, some changes that need to happen in the Federation
are greater than in the RS. For instance, you must resolve the issue of
vital national interests at the cantonal level. I expect, hope and
constantly argue that this issue should be resolved by local authorities.
I will work on this myself, along with the International Community, so that a
solution is found by the politicians you elected.
DA: There is no such precise deadline for changes in the RS. Why?
WP: There is, and it’s the elections. Until then,
vital national interests will be protected by constitutional commissions.
Rest assured that what was agreed will be implemented and the International
Community will keep supporting this process.
Tasks for the end of the mandate
DA: You will leave the position of the High Representative at the end
of May. What will you be working on until then, except the implementation
of the constitutional changes?
WP: Well, I must finish what I set myself to do. Which
means: the basis of the reforms in the judicial system, public services and
public broadcasting must be completed. These are the three large projects
setting the foundation for a modern BiH and I will work on them with dedication
until the end of my mandate.
Perceptible change of public atmosphere
DA: A few nights ago citizens were invited on Federation Television
to vote on the Sarajevo Agreement. About 60 citizens judged this document
positive while 420 said it was not good. How do you interpret these votes?
WP: This is an obvious indicator for me that the broad
public is not adequately acquainted with the contents of the Agreement. I
saw from several contacts I’ve had in the recent days that people are
unbelievably ignorant of the contents of the Agreement. They don’t know
the facts in the Agreement. For example, that about 50 percent of RS
ministers won’t be Serbs, that only two of the six most important functions in
the Entities may be held by one constituent people, or that there will be two
parliamentary chambers in Banja Luka with the right to protect vital national
interests. In time, this attitude of the public will, I’m certain,
change.
Judging by the contacts I’ve had already this morning, I noticed this
change. Many more people than usual came up to congratulate me. So I
believe that people are now beginning to realize that this is a historic moment
for BiH.
Disappearance of SDA and HDZ
DA: You called the SDA and the HDZ dinosaurs. You said
dinosaurs were extinct. These animals disappeared after an asteroid hit
the Earth. Are the SDA and the HDZ disappearing because you “hit” BiH?
WP: It’s not me but democracy that hit BiH. Wherever
democracy takes root and civil society begins to grow, nationalist parties
simply lose their monopoly in representation. I’m certain this will happen
here.
The world’s history is full of these examples. You either adapt to the
new situation – or you disappear.
|
