Status of Implementation of the Reports and Decisions of Human Rights and
Property Institutions Established under Annexes 6 and 7 of the Dayton Peace
Accords
Update - 1 November 1999
This document is intended to give the reader a summary of the status of
the implementation of the reports and decisions of the Ombudsperson of BiH, the
Human Rights Chamber, and the Commission for Real Property Claims of Displaced
Persons and Refugees. (1) Please see the associated documents for
more detailed information.
1. IntroductionAnnex 6 of the GFAP (Dayton Peace Accords) provided for two
Institutions:
- The Human Rights Ombudsperson for Bosnia and
Herzegovina and
- The Human Rights Chamber for Bosnia and Herzegovina
Both Institutions examine complaints of human rights violations committed by
any or all of the three Parties to Annex 6: the State of Bosnia and Herzegovina
(BiH), the Republika Srpska (RS), and the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
(Federation or FBiH). The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is the
primary instrument used for the determination of a violation, although 15 other
international instruments may also be used. Applicants are required to have
exhausted effective domestic remedies before coming to the Institutions. The
Chamber is a judicial body, which uses as its model the European Court of Human
Rights, and issues final and binding decisions. The Ombudsperson combines
judicial determination of violations with mediation in order to solve cases
brought by applicants, and issues recommendations when she finds violations. The
Ombudsperson may also begin investigations of her own accord and issues Special
Reports in such cases.
Annex 7 of Dayton established the Commission
for Real Property Claims of Displaced Persons and Refugees (CRPC). The CRPC is
an independent international body with the authority to make final and binding
legal decisions on claims for real property where the claimant cannot obtain
possession of that property.
Compliance with the decisions and reports of the Institutions is an
obligation of the Dayton Peace Accords(2), the Madrid Declaration of
the Peace Implementation Council(3), and is a pre-condition for the
accession of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the Council of Europe(4).
2. Case file progress to dateTo the end of September 1999, the
Institutions had registered and completed the following number of cases. Figures
in brackets indicate increases over the past six months:
|
Human Rights Chamber |
Ombudsperson |
CRPC |
| Cases registered |
2795 (+907) |
3454 (+551) |
226,000 (approx. +46,000) |
| Cases completed |
303 (+126) |
1335 (+304) |
59,000 (approx. +23,000) |
*CRPC cases registered and completed refer to properties over
which an application was made. These figures are approximate.
3. Compliance and implementation of decisions and reports
- Human Rights Chamber:
The Federation of BiH has made good progress in
compliance. In all final decisions, there has been some progress. Complete
compliance has been achieved in cases involving the following subject
areas:
- Death penalty cases
- Arrest and detention cases
Substantial compliance has been achieved in cases involving the following
subject areas:
- Employment discrimination case
- Military apartment cases
- Compensation awards
Civilian housing matters are and will likely continue to be an area in
which compliance will remain difficult.
The Federation has had close to perfect compliance with provisional orders
of the Chamber.
Republika Srpska has not made adequate progress in
compliance with decisions of the Human Rights Chamber. There has not been
compliance in the following areas:
- Compensation awards in housing matters
- Religious discrimination (Islamic Community)
- A disappearance case
There has been partial compliance in the following areas:
- Reinstatement in abandoned apartment cases
(non-enforcement of judicial decisions)
- Removal of the threat of eviction in "tenancy" contract cases
There has been good compliance by the RS with the provisional orders of the
Human Rights Chamber.
The State of BiH has not had any final cases in
which action was required. It has complied with the provisional measure order
in a case involving a requirement to improve refugee conditions.
- Ombudsperson:
Republika Srpska has achieved compliance in cases
in the following areas:
- Death penalty
- Arrest and Detention
- Employment case
- Freedom of expression
- Length of civil proceedings (non-property related)
- Execution of ordered eviction (repossession of apartments)
Republika Srpska has achieved partial compliance in cases in the following
matters:
- Length of civil or administrative proceedings in
property matters
- Fair hearing in a criminal case
- Development plans - property matters
The Federation of BiH has complied with reports of
the Ombudsperson in the following subject areas:
- Length of civil proceedings in non-property matters
- Abandoned apartment cases (legislative reform required)
Cases in the following subject matters are in partial compliance, or steps
have been taken or indicated:
- Right to life / ill-treatment
- Non-execution of evictions (repossession of houses
and apartments)
- Length of civil proceedings in property matters
- Law on Pensions
- Military apartments
The State of BiH has complied with all decisions in
which the Ombudsperson found a violation and requested the State to take
action, in the following subject areas;
- Freedom of expression, privacy and right to court
(to establish common postal services for all BiH, related to access to
court)
- An abandoned apartment issue in which it was
partially involved
- Brkco (not the State) also complied with a decision involving health
issues
- CRPC
The Commission for Real Property Claims of Displaced Persons and Refugees
(CRPC) is empowered under Annex 7 of the Dayton Agreement to make final and
binding decisions confirming the pre-war rights of dispossessed people. As of
the end of September, CRPC had received a total number of 175,233 claims
relating to 226,428 properties. By issuing final decisions on the legal
entitlement to property (both private property and occupancy rights), the CRPC
has provided the competent authorities responsible for implementing the Dayton
Agreement with the means to meet their responsibilities. Thus far, 59,028
final and binding decisions have been issued by the CRPC. Responsibility for
implementing CRPC decisions lies with the Entities under the specific terms of
Annex 7, and with authorities under the Entitiesą direction at local level.
(5)
While the status of the CRPC as the final decision-making body on property
issues in BiH has been confirmed by domestic legislation passed in both
Entities, (6) to date, the level of compliance with this obligation
and specifically the enforcement of decisions has been manifestly inadequate.
While a small proportion of those who receive final and binding decisions from
CRPC do return into possession of their homes; many continue to meet obstacles
and non-cooperation from the authorities in all areas where their properties
lie.
The following are some of the main obstacles to enforcement:
-
In order to enable a property right holder to return to his/her
pre-war residence, a current occupant must normally be evicted. Domestic law
provides for specific deadlines for vacating property one a decision has
been issued. In practice, few evictions have taken place, whether they
relate to decisions issued by the CRPC or to decisions issued by domestic
administrative organs themselves. The usual reason cited for the failure to
issue an eviction order is the lack of alternative accommodation, though in
practice, many of the occupants in question are not legally entitled to
alternative accommodation.
-
Some municipal officials have advised decision holders that there is
no obligation on them to enforce CRPC decisions, in blatant disregard of the
clear wording of Annex 7 and the final and binding nature of the
certificates.
-
The political will to enforce decisions of the CRPC and to return
refugees and displaced persons to their homes is often lacking or
insufficient. This has been of particular concern in cases where current
occupants are public officials.
Despite the continuing obstacles to enforcement of CRPC decisions, some
progress has been made. Several municipalities throughout BiH and the RS have
begun to recognize the evidentiary value of CRPC decisions, though few have
recognized their executive status. Over the past months, there have been fewer
reported cases of officials refusing to accept CRPC decisions. Improving their
capacity to proceed with their caseloads in a timely and efficient manner is
critical. Further training on the role of housing offices in the implementation
of Annex 7 is equally important.
CRPC continues to remind the competent administrative authorities of their
obligations under Annex 7, and has assisted the Office of the High
Representative in drafting a law which clarifies the responsibilities of
administrative and court officials in regards to the enforcement of CRPC
decisions. The draft laws are currently before the Entities, and indications of
support have been received from both. The promulgation of enforcement
legislation, a requirement set out in the Annex to the December 1998 Madrid
Declaration of the Peace Implementation Council, is expected to improve the
level of compliance with CRPC decisions.
- This reporting is done by the Office of the High
Representative pursuant to Annex 10, Article II(1), sub-paragraphs a) and
f)
- E.g. Annex 6, article 11(6), and Annex 7, article
8.
- Annex, Section 2, paragraph 5.
- Condition 3, elaborated in document AS/Pol (1999) 14
rev.
- Article VIII of Annex 7 provides that "the Parties shall
cooperate with the work of the Commission, and shall respect and implement its
decsions expeditiously and in good faith, in cooperation with relevant
international and nongovernmental organizations having responsibility for the
return and reintegration of refugees and displaced persons."
- Article 13 of the RS Law on the Cessation of the
Application of the Law on the Use of Abandoned Property; and Article 14
of the F BiH Law on the Cessation of the Application of the Law on
Temporary Abandoned Real Property Owned by Citizens and law on the
Cessation of the Application of the Law on Abandoned Apartments all
recognize and affirm the final and binding nature of CRPC
decisions.
OHR Human Rights/Rule of Law Department
|