Human Rights Priorities for 2000
Human Rights Steering Board Recommendations to the Human Rights Task
Force
January 20, 2000
This document sets forth the proposed priorities of the Human Rights Steering
Board, comprised of the OHR, UNHCR, OSCE, OHCHR, UNMIBH and the Council of
Europe, for the year 2000, for the review and approval of the Human Rights Task
Force. It is based upon extensive consultations, through the Human Rights
Coordination Centre, with issue-specific Coordinating Groups, Regional Human
Rights Working Groups, and Bosnian NGOs.
This document succinctly prioritizes critical areas of concern for the year
2000. Should the reader wish additional background material or detail regarding
the scope of these priorities, he or she is referred to three background
documents compiled by the HRCC as part of the HRTF Process, which further
elaborate the priorities stated here: Background Document #1: Assessment and
Priorities of HRSB Coordinating Groups; Background Document #2: Assessment and
Priorities of Regional Human Rights Working Groups; and Background Document #3:
Assessment and Priorities of Bosnian NGOs.
IntroductionAfter four years of international engagement in Bosnia and
Herzegovina, the most serious physical security threats have been eliminated;
yet political obstruction persists in nearly every sphere, resulting in a
severely diminished overall human security for many ordinary citizens. The
promotion of human rights has reached a critical juncture -- renewed focus and
energy must be directed towards those issues upon which tangible impacts
can be achieved, and which will make a meaningful difference and improvement in
the lives of all citizens of BiH.
The human rights community must in a concerted and energized manner, tackle
the political obstruction which prevents the realization of substantive human
rights throughout Bosnia and Herzegovina. It must continue to assist in the
establishment of legal frameworks and structures which build respect for the
rule of law. Further, the human rights community must continue to strengthen and
secure mechanisms which will ensure Bosnian ownership over human rights
protection, ultimately leading the way to a self-sustaining peace.
The elimination of discrimination on any prohibited ground is
central. Bosnians must be able to expect that regardless of their ethnicity,
political opinion, religion, or gender, they are entitled to be treated in a
non-discriminatory manner by their officials, be they the police, judiciary, or
administrative authorities. Each priority described below will, in year 2000, be
tackled with a recognition of presently discriminatory impacts, and a view to
their eradication.
In addressing priorities for 2000, awareness and addressing of discrimination
based on gender must be a central concern. Human Rights Steering Board members
agree to direct particular attention to ensuring that legislative and
programmatic developments adequately address the needs of both women and men.
Critically, this must include the involvement of gender specialists in the
process of legislative review, through the Gender Coordinating Group.
1. Sustainable Futures in BiH: Substantive Justice for AllAll Bosnians,
whether those who stayed in one location throughout the war, the internally
displaced, or those who fled and returned, are affected in their daily lives by
a series of legal and political obstacles which render daily life difficult.
From the repossession of property, to registering oneas residence and receiving
an ID Card, enrolling oneas children in school, becoming gainfully employed,
securing access to pensions, to reconnecting to electricity, water, or telephone
networks in each of these elements of daily life Bosnians are confronted
by abuses emanating from the law or from the conduct of their officials. This is
particularly so for returnees, either of the majority or minority ethnic groups,
minorities who stayed, and those of the "wrong" political persuasion. In 1999,
efforts to address each of these interlocking issues were undertaken by the
international community, with success in some cases, but leaving much to be
addressed in the year 2000.
In the sphere of property repossession, the primary legislation required to
secure the right of individuals to repossess their property was achieved through
the imposition of more than twenty laws and Decisions by the High
Representative. Loopholes previously used by obstructive officials to
effectively deny the right to return were closed, paving the way for a shift in
focus towards implementation rather than legislative efforts. Multiple occupancy
commissions and property commissions throughout BiH delivered preliminary
successes in some regions, while police participation at evictions improved
implementation in Sarajevo and select other locations. Yet overall, the
implementation rate remains extremely low, with a mere five percent
reinstatement rate throughout the country, and an even lower rate in Bosnian
Croat and Bosnian Serb majority regions. This acts to strangle return
possibilities.
Return of families with children, in particular, is further frustrated by the
prevalence of discrimination in the education system. Primary and secondary
education are divided along ethnic lines, and integration is severely hampered
by nationalist rhetoric on all sides. Many children study from foreign textbooks
which contain highly offensive material, and throughout the country "schools"
are emerging in homes as a response to the failure to establish a multi-ethnic
education system. Despite some successes in 1999, such as significant steps
towards the eradication of offensive materials from textbooks, the task for the
year 2000 and beyond is daunting: to ensure that children throughout BiH are
offered not only a quality education, but an education which will foster long
term reconciliation and prospects for a sustained peace.
Similarly, as individuals and families return, or as they continue their
lives in displacement within Bosnia and Herzegovina, the issue of sustainable
livelihoods -- both through employment and, where appropriate, through pension
entitlements -- is ever more pressing. Clearly, lack of employment options is a
daunting challenge; discrimination in employment, on the basis of ethnicity,
political opinion, or gender serves to accentuate already pronounced challenges
to integration. Discrimination in access to pension entitlements remains,
despite efforts by the human rights community, a tangible obstacle for many
Bosnians. Limited preliminary successes in 1999, such as the conceptualization
of the "Conditional Investment Project," the development of "Fair
Employment Principles" based on international examples, and the enshrining
of a comprehensive non-discrimination clause in the recently adopted
Federation Labour Law offer tools to address the issue of
discrimination in employment. Efforts underway to merge the pension funds in the
Federation also offer hope. Yet the imperatives for the year 2000 are clear: a
concerted effort to address these issues must be prioritized, or the limited
post-war progress in terms of return will not be sustainable.
Finally, a critical concern to those returning and minorities who stayed
throughout the war is their physical and psychological security. The arrest of
war criminals indicted by the ICTY, and support for the exhumations process is
essential for the promotion not only of reintegration, but also reconciliation.
To date co-operation by local authorities with the ICTY has been poor; with
respect to exhumations co-operation has generally been good. The challenge for
2000 will be to assist in ensuring that both processes move forward.
Priorities for the year 2000 must therefore address these core issues:
ensuring that Bosnians are able to repossess their homes; that the education
system is fundamentally reformed and improved; that all Bosnians are offered
better prospects for sustainable livelihoods; and that physical and
psychological security is promoted through better state and entity co-operation
with the ICTY. As identified more specifically below, this must include ongoing
efforts to address administrative and legal barriers to return, which continue,
despite ongoing efforts, to pose obstacles. It must also include efforts to
ensure access, without discrimination, to primary health care and any other
assistance available.
Priority Tasks (1):
- Continuation of efforts to ensure the physical and psychological
security of all Bosnians, through ongoing efforts on police training
and integration, independent investigation of human rights violations by local
police, close monitoring of targeted investigations conducted by the local
police, and continued support for the exhumations and ICTY liaison.
(UNMIBH, OHR, OHCHR)
- Targeted political interventions to secure implementation of the
property laws in order to facilitate return of displaced persons.
This must include a mechanism to recommend punitive action against officials
who obstruct implementation of the property laws. (OHR, OSCE, UNHCR,
UNMIBH)
- Removal of administrative barriers to return, through:
adoption and implementation of state and entity laws on ID cards and residency
registration; political interventions to ensure equality of access to utility
provision; and renewed efforts to ensure access to and recognition of public
documents. (OHR, OSCE, UNHCR, UNMIBH, SFOR)
- Removal of legal barriers to return, through: amendment
of the RS Law on Peace and Public Order; adoption and implementation
of the state and entity laws on refugees and displaced persons; and
implementation of citizenship laws in BiH and the RS, and adoption and
implementation of the same in the Federation. (OHR, OSCE, UNHCR, UNMIBH,
CoE)
- Development and if necessary, imposition of a process leading to the
implementation of a joint framework educational curriculum
throughout BiH, with a view to introducing a new curriculum for the 2000-2001
school year. Continued review and improvement of textbooks, coupled with
ongoing interventions to ensure ethnic integration of classrooms, and access
of all returnee children to educational facilities. (2) (OHR,
OSCE, UNHCR, CoE)
- Continuation of efforts to reduce employment
discrimination, on any prohibited ground, through the promotion of
"Fair Employment Principles" and the implementation of the
"Conditional Investment Project." A review of the RS Labour
Law is essential, as is monitoring of the discriminatory impacts of the
privatization process. Efforts to ensure the re-employment of pre-conflict
employees should be strengthened. (OSCE, OHCHR, CoE)
- Continuation of efforts to ensure that pensioners are able to
realize their pension entitlements, through efforts to establish an
appropriate legal framework (equalization of entity legislation, adoption of a
new law in the RS in line with the BiH Constitution and human rights
standards, and adoption of a state level law regulating basic pension rights
and co-operation between the three funds), through efforts to unify the
pensions funds, and through monitoring of the impending agreement between the
three funds. (OHR, UNHCR, OSCE, OHCHR)
- Political interventions to ensure that all citizens are able to
access electricity, water, gas and telephone, without discriminatory
treatment. Implementation of the July 30 HR Decision of regarding telephone
reconnection. (OHR, OSCE, UNHCR)
- Legislative review and interventions to ensure non-discrimination
in policy and practice with respect to health care provision, coupled
with support for inter-entity co-operation in the field of health care, and
support for the creation of affordable health insurance. Support to local
authorities to ensure their development of an HIV/AIDS awareness program.
(OHCHR, UNMIBH, CoE)
- Establishment of an evaluation mechanism to determine conditions of
return, to ensure that the displaced are able to return in safety and dignity.
(UNHCR)
- Monitoring of the treatment of vulnerable groups such as minority
returnees and Roma, to ensure that benefits are equally available to
all sections of the population. (OSCE, UNHCR, OHCHR)
- Review of laws and monitoring of implementation of laws, such as the
entity amnesty laws, to ensure non-discrimination in law or effect. (OHR,
UNHCR, OSCE, UNMIBH, OHCHR, CoE)
2. Legal Frameworks and Structures: Building Respect for the Rule of
LawDespite considerable efforts, impartiality of administration, law
enforcement, and of the justice system, have not been achieved. Each remains
distinguished not by fairness, but by arbitrariness of conduct, and is marked by
a lack of accountability, and transparency. Monitoring of select court cases
reveals political interference; judges are not yet independent or impartial;
inter-ethnic crimes such as return-related violence still often do not receive a
fair hearing; parallel courts persist in Canton 7; and inter-entity legal
co-operation remains difficult in most parts of the country. There is a serious
lack of security in courts, and court decisions are not enforced in many cases.
Local police can still not be said to be operating in compliance with human
rights standards. In 1999, numerous efforts were undertaken by the international
community to assist in the establishment of the rule of law in Bosnia, but
again, much remains to be done.
Promotion of the rule of law requires not only support to existing
structures, but institution- and capacity-building. Indeed such efforts are
essential to secure the eventual hand-over from the international community to
Bosnians. In 1999, efforts to create an independent judiciary were furthered by
the adoption of identical codes of ethics in the Federation and the RS. Laws
regulating the selection and dismissal of judges have been drafted and are
pending before the respective legislative bodies. Laws aimed at strengthening
the independence of judges and prosecutors in the Federation were imposed, but
have yet to be implemented. Efforts to address inter-ethnic crimes, such as
return-related violence, were furthered by the adoption of a law strengthening
the Federation Prosecutoras office in cases which fall within the exclusive
jurisdiction of the Federation including crimes with inter-cantonal dimensions
(such as organized crime including trafficking in persons). As well, amendments
to the Law on the Supreme Court in the Federation provide the first instance
jurisdiction to hear the cases that fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of
the Federation. However, implementation of these two Federation laws has proved
difficult. In the year 2000, these preliminary successes must be carried forward
and developed, to ensure that an impartial and independent judiciary becomes a
reality.
Laws providing for the establishment of Judicial Training Centres in the
Federation and the RS, which would provide a concrete mechanism for the
development of a consistent ethic of impartiality within the judiciary, are near
completion. The challenge for the year 2000 will ultimately be to operationalize
these centres. With respect to the development of a system of legal aid and
legal advice provision, progress was made in 1999 with respect to coordination
in the international community, and it has been agreed that a law to regulate
legal aid provision is essential. In the year 2000, with shrinking funding to
some agencies, the challenge will be to ensure that this fundamental mechanism
providing access to justice is not irreparably jeopardized.
In the sphere of policing, efforts to restructure and reform the police
forces of both entities are underway, but progressing slowly. Inappropriate
political influences continue to impede the establishment of professional police
forces in accordance with internationally accepted principles of democratic
policing. Minority participation in both the Federation and the RS police forces
is still limited, with both entities far from meeting minimum representational
requirements. In the Federation, efforts to restructure the Federation Ministry
of Interior have not yet been completed, and there is continued resistance to
remove parallel structures from within Ministries of Interior in mixed cantons.
In neither entity has the full potential of the police academies been
reached
The adoption of the BiH Law on Immigration and Asylum constitutes an
important step towards the establishment of the rule of law and respect for
international standards of refugee protection and treatment of aliens. However,
a number of steps remain to be taken by the State and Entity Governments, in
order for the law to be implemented; drafting of the by-laws and instructions at
state and entity level; establishment of the bodies foresee in the law; training
of the officials and translation of relevant documents.
One issue which critically reflects progress within Bosnia towards
responsible, impartial administration of justice is local war crimes arrest and
prosecution in a manner free from discrimination and bias. On this highly
charged issue, there have been some achievements in 1999. The number of local
arrests of suspected war criminals in violation of the Rules of the Road has
substantially decreased. This has greatly enhanced freedom of movement and has
reduced arbitrary arrests. However, co-operation with the ICTY remains generally
poor.
In the year 2000, priorities in this field must therefore include: continued
efforts to secure the independence and impartiality of the judiciary; ongoing
efforts towards police restructuring as required by the Luxembourg PIC; and
continued monitoring to ensure that domestic arrests and trials of war criminals
are conducted in a manner free from discrimination.
Priority Tasks:
- Continue building foundations which promote the rule of
law, through: securing the passage and implementation of the Law
on Judicial and Prosecutorial Service in the Federation and the Law
on Courts and Judicial Service in the RS; promotion of the entity laws on
judicial training and assisting in the establishment of the Judicial Training
Centers in the Federation and the RS; assisting and promoting the amendment of
the RS Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code; and
promotion of the enactment of witness protection/ anonymity laws in the RS.
(OHR, UNMIBH-JSAP, OSCE, CoE)
- Continuing building of institutions which will support the
establishment of the rule of law, through: implementation of the
amended Law on the Supreme Court and Law on the Federation Prosecutoras
Office; strengthening the role of the prosecutors in the investigation
and trial, relative to the police and the investigative judge while
strengthening the role of the defense attorneys in the criminal process;
further reviewing the organisation and operation of the Minor Offenses Courts;
implementation of the Law on Court Police in the Federation, adoption
of a law on court police in the RS, as well as training in both
entities; and continuation of efforts to revive and expand the suspended
Commission on Inter-Entity Legal Co-operation Improvement of the mechanisms
for enforcement of civil judgments. (OHR, UNMIBH-JSAP, OSCE,
CoE)
- Continued support for capacity building efforts in the field of
rule of law, through: assisting in the creation of viable and
accessible domestic structures for the provision of legal advice, and
strengthening the existing Legal Aid Programme (Benefits Commission) by
establishing it as a domestic legal institution, in part through the drafting
of legal aid legislation and in part by securing funding until it can be
handed over to the government; securing longer term sustainable funding for
the legal assistance (legal advice and legal aid) sector as a whole through
the establishment of a legal assistance fund; increased domestic and
applicable international legal information and materials should be made
available to judges, practitioners and the general public; continued efforts
with respect to the litigation strategy; and finally, the public regarding
reforms taking place and their rights under law. (UNHCR, OSCCoE, OHR,
OHCHR)
- Continued efforts to restructure the police forces in both
Entities. Efforts will continue with respect to restructuring and
reform of local police in accordance with democratic principles of policing
and international human rights standards. Specifically, efforts will intensify
with respect to police registration, minority recruitment, unifying parallel
police structures and establishing common institutions such as the state
border service. IPTF registration of all police personnel and the removal of
provisional authorization to exercise police powers from police not meeting
minimum standards will continue to be employed as strategies. (UNMIBH,
OHR, CoE)
- Continued monitoring of select cases and of the general
conduct of local authorities and the local police, to guage the success of
efforts listed above. Specifically: Monitoring of judicial and other
authorities who fail to execute their duties properly, with a view to their
eventual removal and or prosecution; continuing to monitor trials including
domestic war crimes trials, to ensure that international human rights
standards are met; and continued monitoring of compliance with the Rules of
the Road. (OHR, OSCE, UNHCR through Legal Aid Centres, UNMIBH)
- Continued monitoring of trials, particularly those with
an inter-ethnic dimension, or domestic war crimes trials, to ensure that
international standards are being met and that the proper administration of
justice is being followed. (OSCE, OHR)
- Continued review of legislation to ensure compliance with the ECHR.
- Full implementation of the BiH Law on Immigration and
Asylum, in particular with regard to; drafting of by-laws and
instructions at State and Entity level, regulating in detail the
implementation of the law; establishment of the bodies foreseen in the law;
transfer to the Ministry of Civil Affairs and Communications of records on
decisions taken by competent governmental institutions regarding the entry,
movement and stay of aliens, as well as the grant of asylum; training of State
and Entity officials in international refugee and asylum law;
translation/distribution of relevant refugee-related
documents/handbooks/training modules. (OHR, UNHCR, OHCHR,
UNMIBH)
3. Building Sustainable Domestic Human Rights CapacitySuccessful peace
implementation in Bosnia and Herzegovina must mean in part the successful
development of a domestic human rights protection capacity. This includes the
implementation of the human rights protections offered by the
Ombuds-Institutions and the Human Rights Chamber, in a manner which offers
genuine, credible, domestic remedies where human rights violations occur. It
includes the development of a vibrant and active civil society, equipped,
through NGOs and the media, to act in a preventative manner as a watch against
encroachments on human rights, and as an information and advocacy resource,
where violations have occurred. Finally, such a domestic human rights protection
capacity includes the development of a human-rights-sensitive legal profession
and public, cognizant of human rights guarantees to which they are protected,
and able to utilize those protections in a concrete manner.
With respect to the protections offered through the Ombuds-Institutions and
the Human Rights Chamber, much remains to be achieved. While some progress was
evident 1999, the local authorities in both the Federation and the RS have
failed to comply with many reports and decisions, particularly with respect to
property cases. Overall, the level of compliance with decisions of these bodies
is not sufficient to offer genuine, credible remedies to human rights
violations. There is no general level of acceptance of the obligation of parties
to secure human rights, including the prevention of future violations.
Still outstanding at the end of 1999 is adequate state funding for the human
rights institutions as required under the Dayton agreement; the establishment of
an RS Ombuds-Institution; implementation of CRPC certificates, in compliance
with Dayton and with new laws specifically requiring their implementation; the
publishing of decisions of the Human Rights Chamber in the Official Gazettes;
and adequate co-operation by authorities at all levels with the Agents of the
RS, the Federation and the State. International efforts in 2000 must attempt to
address these still outstanding issues.
Efforts to develop the capacity of civil society, through NGOs, to address
human rights issues and to ensure the sustainability of human rights activities
currently undertaken by international organizations have continued throughout
1999, including monitoring of human rights violations, as well as monitoring the
response of authorities and monitoring of court proceedings. Important
legislative work must be undertaken in 2000 however, to ensure that these NGOs
(as well as many active on other issues) are able to work effectively. Namely,
the now complete state and entity Laws on Associations and Foundations
must be passed, in order to ensure a legislative environment which is conducive
to the work of Bosnian NGOs.
Progressive media in Bosnia and Herzegovina have been thwarted from being
able to provide critical, objective information, as evidenced most dramatically
by the assassination attempt on a Banja Luka journalist in 1999. According to
the Federation Ombudsmen and the Helsinki Committee, numerous journalists who
challenge party lines and take the risks necessary for critical reporting, have
found themselves facing charges for slander and libel. Preliminary efforts were
undertaken in 1999, including the establishment of a legislative advisory group
on media laws, removal by the High Representative of a term of imprisonment as a
possible criminal penalty for slander and libel, and the appointment by the
Federation Ombudsmen of a special assistant focusing on media issues. These
efforts must be strengthened in 2000 by the establishment of a new legislative
framework, and concrete measures to protect journalists. Without this, a
critical source of information and advocacy for the protection of human rights
will be silenced.
Efforts to improve understanding by citizens of their human rights, including
incorporation of human rights education into university and school curricula,
have been undertaken but have not achieved the desired visibility. Efforts in
this regard must continue for the year 2000, particularly with respect to
increasing access to human rights materials, and continuing education of lawyers
with respect to the European Convention on Human Rights.
These mechanisms will ultimately form the basis of human rights protection in
Bosnia and Herzegovina, beyond the presence of the international community. In
2000, particularly in the context of ever-shrinking resources, efforts must be
refocused to ensure that these tools for the protection of human rights are
strengthened to the greatest extent possible. Priority tasks in that regard
include the following:
Priority Tasks:
- Based on the concept of national ownership of human rights protection, the
international community will work at a senior level to ensure prompt
and full implementation of the orders of the Human Rights Chamber and Reports
of the BiH Ombudsperson and the Federation Ombudsmen by the
responsible national authorities. Equally, the IC must levy the political
pressure necessary to ensure that CRPC Decisions are enforced. (OHR, OSCE,
UNMIBH, CoE)
- Ensure strengthening of the Human Rights Institutions, through
encouraging adequate state funding of the institutions,
coupled with international funding as necessary. (OHR, OSCE, UNHCR,
CoE)
- Reform of the human rights mechanisms on the basis of an opinion, from the Venice Commission, on
the future of human rights mechanisms in BiH, to be completed prior to the
expiration of the five year transitional period in Annex 6 of Dayton.
- Promote co-operation between the Agents and the local authorities, and
encourage the authorities to provide adequate funding, particularly to the RS
Agent. Additionally, the international community must promote continuing
co-operation between the Agents and the human rights institutions, including
prompt and full responses by authorities at all levels for information and
documents. (OHR, OSCE, CoE)
- Promote the adoption, in the first half of 2000, of the State, RS, and
Federation laws governing their respective Ombuds-institutions. (OHR,
OSCE, CoE)
- Ensure the adoption of State and Entity Laws on Associations and
Foundations, in order to ensure that a conducive legal framework
exists for NGOs throughout the country. (OSCE, OHR, OHCHR, UNHCR,
CoE)
- Promote co-operation between agencies working to advance the
ability of NGOs and other members of civil society to be active in a
human rights arena, through the establishment of an HRSB Coordinating Group on
NGOs and Civil Society. (OSCE, OHR, OHCHR, UNHCR, CoE)
- Increase production of human rights and public information tools
and materials, such as
translations of already existing publications, or new publications tailored to
the BiH audience.(CoE, OHCHR, UNHCR, UNMIBH)
- Continue training on the European Convention on Human
Rights, in particular for legal aid lawyers, as well as for others in
the legal community. Such training must be progressively linked with the
Judicial Training Centres. (CoE, UNHCR, OHCHR)
- Drafting, adoption and implementation of laws on defamation and
freedom of information; coupled with the development of concrete
proposals for the protection of journalists. (OHR, OSCE, CoE)
ConclusionThe year 2000 year must be utilized to renew, focus and
consolidate engagement on human rights issues in Bosnia and Herzegovina. As
critical resources show signs of diminishing and international attention is
diverted to other post-war countries, the international community must
tackle key issues in the year 2000, issues which will tangibly improve the lives
of Bosnian citizens, and ultimately lead the way for international
disengagement.
Core issues must be addressed: Ensuring sustainable futures,
through addressing concrete issues of livelihood, property, education, pension,
is essential for promoting reintegration and reconciliation, and must be a key
priority. Only in addressing these issues, while securing an environment of
non-discrimination, can the international community hope to leave behind a
sustainable peace. Efforts to establish and strengthen the rule of law, giving
Bosnians confidence in their judiciary and police, must be strengthened and
consolidated. And tools must be put in place to ensure Bosnian ownership over
human rights protection mechanisms, through human rights institutions, NGO
development, and the fostering of an independent and vibrant media.
More than ever, the international community must definitively challenge the
obstructive forces which for four years have prevented a full implementation the
of peace and the protection of human rights. Those who seek to delay these
efforts towards a BiH where human rights are protected must not be permitted to
further de-rail peace-building process.
Much must be achieved in the year 2000. The human and financial resources
presently available to address the above human rights priorities must be
utilized in a focused, strategic, and concerted manner. Continued co-operation
of the human rights community will be essential for the achievement of this
goal.
Footnotes:
- Priority tasks are not listed in order of importance.
- SFOR has indicated willingness to assist in securing physical access to
schools, where necessary.
OHR Human Rights/Rule of Law Department
|