|
In the exercise of the powers vested in
the High Representative by Article V of Annex 10 (Agreement on Civilian
Implementation of the Peace Settlement) to the General Framework Agreement for
Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina, according to which the High Representative is
the final authority in theatre regarding interpretation of the said Agreement on
the Civilian Implementation of the Peace Settlement; and considering in
particular Article II.1.(d) of the last said Agreement, according to the terms
of which the High Representative shall “Facilitate, as the High Representative
judges necessary, the resolution of any difficulties arising in connection with
civilian implementation”;
Recalling paragraph XI.2 of the Conclusions of the Peace
Implementation Conference held in Bonn on 9 and 10 December 1997, in which the
Peace Implementation Council welcomed the High Representative’s intention to use
his final authority in theatre regarding interpretation of the Agreement on the
Civilian Implementation of the Peace Settlement in order to facilitate the
resolution of any difficulties as aforesaid “by making binding decisions, as he
judges necessary” on certain issues including (under sub-paragraph (c) thereof)
measures to ensure the Peace Agreement throughout Bosnia and Herzegovina and its
Entities which “may include actions against persons holding public office”;
Noting that in paragraph X. 4 of the Annex to the Declaration
of the Peace Implementation Council made at Madrid on 16 December 1998 it was
stated that the Council acknowledged that leaders whom the High Representative
bars from official office "may also be barred from running in elections and from
any other elective or appointive public office and from office within political
parties until further notice";
Mindful of the fact that the peace implementation process, which continues to be
pursued under the aegis of the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina , is not yet complete;
Further mindful of the fact that the peace implementation
process requires to be completed in order that a stable political and security
environment in Bosnia
and Herzegovina is established which is conducive,
inter alia, to fundamental economic reform and to the return of refugees
and displaced persons;
Recalling that under Article II, Paragraph 8 of the
Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, all competent authorities in Bosnia and
Herzegovina shall cooperate with and provide unrestricted access to the
International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and shall in particular comply
with orders issued pursuant to Article 29 of the Statute of the Tribunal;
Recalling further all relevant resolutions of the
Security Council of the United Nations and in particular Resolution 1503 of 28
August 2003 and Resolution 1534 of 26 March 2004 by which the Security Council
called upon all States, especially Serbia and Montenegro, Croatia and Bosnia and
Herzegovina, and on the Republika Srpska within Bosnia and Herzegovina, to
intensify cooperation with and render all necessary assistance to the ICTY,
particularly to bring Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic, […] and all other
indictees to the ICTY;
Noting that Bosnia and Herzegovina’s failure to meet its international
obligations towards the International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia
increasingly constitutes an obstacle to Bosnia
and Herzegovina’s integration into
Europe;
Further noting, by way of illustration, the Istanbul Summit
Communiqué issued on 28 June 2004 by which the Heads of State and Government
participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council expressed their
concerns that Bosnia and Herzegovina, particularly obstructionist elements in
the Republika Srpska entity, has failed to live up to its obligation to
cooperate fully with ICTY, including the arrest and transfer to the jurisdiction
of the Tribunal of war crimes indictees, a fundamental requirement for the
country to join Partnership for Peace.
Recalling that theSteering Board of the Peace Implementation
Council, at its meeting held in Sarajevo on 25 June 2004, noted that Republika
Srpska has failed to locate or apprehend even one war-crimes indictee in the
nine years since the Dayton Accord and reminded that Republika Srpska, an Entity
of Bosnia and Herzegovina guaranteed under Dayton, is failing to carry out a key
obligation under Dayton and international law, for which the relevant
individuals and institutions must be held accountable.
Ever conscious of the need to balance in due proportion the
public interest with the rights of individuals.
For the reasons hereinafter set out the High Representative hereby issues the
following:
DECISION
To remove Mr. Zoran Djeric from his position of Minister
of Interior of Republika Srpska and to bar him from:
- Holding any law enforcement, or executive public
office;
- Holding any position within a Ministry of Interior or equivalent; and
unless or until such time as the High Representative may, expressly authorise
him so to do or to hold the same.
Furthermore, Zoran Djeric’s additional exclusion under Article 20.9A of the
Election Law of Bosnia and
Herzegovina
(Official Gazette BiH 23/01, 7/02, 9/02, 20/02, 25/02, 4/04 and 20/04) shall
cease to have effect as of 31
December 2004.
Any entitlement henceforth to receive non-vested remuneration or any
privileges or status arising out of his post as Minister of Interior ceases
forthwith.
This Decision has immediate effect and will not require any further
procedural steps.
Mr. Djeric must vacate his office immediately.
This Decision shall be published without delay in the Official Gazette of
Republika Srpska.
Reasons for Removal
Bosnia and Herzegovina
has singularly failed to discharge
its international obligation to bring closure to arguably the most lamentable
chapter of its history. It has failed especially and egregiously in the
territory of the Republika Srpska to apprehend and deliver to just prosecution a
number of persons indicted under Article 19 of the Statute of the ICTY.
Said failure could not have occurred without the active assistance of
individuals and entities, or indeed without the general culture of both overt
and secret complicity and of silence prevalent in the one Entity of Bosnia and
Herzegovina
where such individuals are believed to have found sanctuary, i.e.,
Republika Srpska.
Despite its constitutionally mandated duty to fully co-operate with ICTY --
which duty was impressed upon Republika Srpska further by the Resolutions of the
United Nations Security Council referenced above -- indicted individuals remain
at large within Republika Srpska and have been and are presently assisted in
evading justice by individuals in positions of authority and by institutions of
a state and political character. That this state of affairs has continued
for nine years following the end of the war without a single war criminal being
arrested in the territory of the Republika Srpska by the authorities of the
Republika Srpska, is a source of deep and abiding concern not only for the
people of Bosnia and Herzegovina but for the international community as a
whole.
Mr. Djeric holds the position of Minister of Interior of Republika
Srpska.
Under Article 6 of the Law on Internal Affairs of Republika Srpska
(RS. OG. 48/03), the responsibilities and activities of the police in the
territory of
Republika Srpska
shall be carried out directly by the Ministry
of Interior of Republika Srpska. Under Article 9 of said Law, the Ministry
of Interior shall be managed by the Minister of Interior.
Since his appointment as Minister of Interior, the competent law enforcement
agencies of Republika Srpska have failed to arrest a single person indicted
under Article 19 of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the
Former Yugoslavia and persons indicted by said Tribunal have consequently been
able to elude just prosecution.
Mr. Djeric, who holds clear functional responsibilities for this failure, has
thus failed to supervise and manage his Ministry and perform his functions as
Minister of Interior in the manner expected of the holder of such an office and
has failed to ensure that the Ministry of Interior of Republika Srpska fulfilled
its obligations under the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina. His
failure has further prevented
Bosnia and Herzegovina
from complying fully with its
international obligations to cooperate with the International Criminal Tribunal
for the Former Yugoslavia.
As Minister of Interior, Mr. Djeric has a duty to be held to account for the
policies, decisions, actions or omissions of law enforcement agencies under the
Ministry of Interior of Republika Srpska.
Mr. Djeric, has to that extent, obstructed the process of peace
implementation and has to be removed from public office.
Sarajevo, 30 June
2004
Paddy Ashdown
High Representative
|