|
In the exercise of the powers vested in the High
Representative by Article V of Annex 10 (Agreement on Civilian Implementation of
the Peace Settlement) to the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and
Herzegovina, according to which the High Representative is the final authority
in theatre regarding interpretation of the said Agreement on the Civilian
Implementation of the Peace Settlement; and considering in particular Article
II.1. (d) of the last said Agreement, according to the terms of which the High
Representative shall "Facilitate, as the High Representative judges necessary,
the resolution of any difficulties arising in connection with civilian
implementation";
Recalling paragraph XI.2 of the Conclusions of the Peace
Implementation Conference held in Bonn on 9 and 10 December 1997, in which the
Peace Implementation Council welcomed the High Representative's intention to use
his final authority in theatre regarding interpretation of the Agreement on the
Civilian implementation of the Peace Settlement in order to facilitate the
resolution of any difficulties as aforesaid "by making binding decisions, as he
judges necessary" on certain issues including (under sub-paragraph (c) thereof)
measures to ensure the Peace Agreement throughout Bosnia and Herzegovina and its
Entities which "may include actions against persons holding public office or
officials...who are found by the High Representative to be in violation of legal
commitments made under the Peace Agreement or the terms for its
implementation";
Mindful of the fact that the peace implementation
process requires to be completed in order that a stable political and security
environment in
Bosnia and Herzegovina
is established which is conducive,
inter alia, to fundamental reform;
Conscious of the need to prevent the funding of activities
which are, or which threaten to be obstructive of the peace implementation
process as pursued under the aegis of the General Framework Agreement for Peace
in Bosnia and Herzegovina;
Bearing in mind that at
Madrid
on
16 December
1998 the Peace Implementation
Council set out its concerns as follows: "The Council expresses deep concern
about continuing corruption and evasion of public funds. It welcomes the High
Representative's development of a comprehensive anti-corruption strategy… The
High Representative will take the lead in co-ordinating International Community
efforts aimed at eliminating opportunities for corruption, tax evasion and
diversion of public revenue, ensuring transparency in all phases of governmental
operation...";
Noting that the Election Law of Bosnia and
Herzegovina
requires the Presidents of political parties to state that the activities of the
political party comply with the General Framework Agreement for Peace in
Bosnia and Herzegovina ;
Cognizant that the Election Law of Bosnia and Herzegovina and
the Law on Party Financing of Bosnia and Herzegovina introduced the concept of
transparency of funding of political parties with a view to curb ingrained
corruption in Bosnia and Herzegovina which undermines democratic governance,
wastes public resources and hinders the development of market economy;
Considering Recommendation 1516(2001) on the Financing of
Political Parties adopted by the Standing Committee, acting on behalf of the
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, which provides that "in the
case of a violation of the legislation, political parties should be subject to
meaningful sanctions, […] and that when individual responsibility is
established, sanction should include the annulment of the elected mandate or a
period of ineligibility";
Recalling that the Directive Suspending All Disbursements of
Budgetary Itemisations for Party Funding to the Srpska Demokratska Stranka
(hereinafter: the SDS) and Ordering the SDS to Submit a Financial Plan for the
Period from 1 January 2003 until 31 March 2004 remains in force;
Mindful of the Financial Report of 19 April 2004 submitted by the SDS pursuant to the said
Directive of the High Representative and the report of the Special Auditor for
Republika Srpska on the said Financial Report released on 24 June 2004;
Distressed by the fact that the SDS Financial Report contains
evidence of a disturbing pattern of violations of the Law on Party Financing of
Bosnia and
Herzegovina;
Recalling that the aforementioned Financial Report shows that
no sufficient safeguards are in place against SDS funds being used to assist
persons indicted under Article 19 of the Statute of the International Criminal
Tribunal for former Yugoslavia, such as Radovan Karadzic, and their support
structure;
Noting that there is evidence, including a letter from Radovan
Karadzic that the said individual was in regular contact with and has received
assistance from the SDS;
Recognizing that no other evidence has been proffered to
exonerate the SDS in this connection;
Noting that
Bosnia and Herzegovina
’s failure to meet its international
obligations towards the International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia
(ICTY) increasingly constitutes an obstacle to
Bosnia and Herzegovina
’s integration into
Europe and that this failure is largely attributable to
failures on the part of the Entity of Republika Srpska;
Further noting, by way of illustration, the Istanbul Summit
Communiqué issued on 28 June 2004 by which the Heads of State and Government
participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council expressed their
concerns that Bosnia and Herzegovina, particularly obstructionist elements in
the Republika Srpska entity, has failed to live up to its obligation to
cooperate fully with ICTY, including the arrest and transfer to the jurisdiction
of the Tribunal of war crimes indictees, a fundamental requirement for the
country to join Partnership for Peace;
Recalling that theSteering Board of the Peace Implementation
Council, at its meeting held in Sarajevo on 25 June 2004, noted that Republika
Srpska has failed to locate or apprehend even one war-crimes indictee in the
nine years since the Dayton Accord and reminded that Republika Srpska an Entity
of Bosnia and Herzegovina guaranteed under Dayton, is failing to carry out a key
obligation under Dayton and international law, for which the relevant
individuals and institutions must be held accountable.
Having considered, borne in mind and noted all the matters
aforesaid, the High Representative hereby issues the following:
DECISION
Blocking All Bank Accounts Held by and/or in the Name of the
SDS and Requiring the SDS to Establish one Bank Account
I. Blocking of Bank Accounts
Article 1
Each and every account held by and/or in the name of the SDS, including local
and municipal SDS organizations, is and shall be blocked in each and every bank
and its branches coming within the jurisdiction of the Banking Agency of
Republika Srpska or the Banking Agency of the Federation of Bosnia and
Herzegovina, with immediate effect and until further notice.
For the avoidance of doubt, money, valuables or other property held to the
accounts of the SDS as aforesaid, shall be deemed to include such money,
valuables or property held in bank vaults or otherwise in the safe keeping of
the bank concerned.
Article 2
By close of business on 2 July 2004, each bank and its branches, with one or
more accounts held by and/or in the name of the SDS, must report to the Office
of the High Representative, to the Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina and to
the Banking Agency of Republika Srpska and the Banking Agency of the Federation
of Bosnia and Herzegovina all blockings effected pursuant to this
Decision. Such reports must include details as to all authorized
signatories to accounts so blocked, account balances and account numbers.
Article 3
Failure to comply with this Decision by the director of a bank, by any
individual on behalf of a bank or by any employee thereof may hereafter be
treated as participation in a transaction contrary to the provisions of the
Entity Laws on Banking Agencies and Entity Laws on Banks and may lead to
penalties which can include, in the case of individuals, financial penalties
and, in the case of a bank, the revocation of the licence of that Bank.
II. Establishment of one Bank Account
Article 4
Within 15 days after the Decision becomes effective, the SDS shall establish
one bank account in a commercial bank duly licenced in
Bosnia
and Herzegovina.
Within 2 days of the establishment of one bank account, evidence of such
establishment shall be forwarded to the Office of the High Representative, the
Central Bank of
Bosnia and Herzegovina
and, as appropriate, the Banking
Agency of Republika Srpska or the Banking Agency of the Federation of Bosnia and
Herzegovina
. The
evidence shall include the name of the commercial bank, the account number and
the authorized signatories on the said account.
Banks and their branches with blocked accounts are directed, upon
notification by the relevant Banking Agency that the bank account provided in
paragraph 1 of this Article has been established, to transfer the amount of
funds contained in such blocked accountsto the said bank account and to close
the blocked accounts after the transfer.
Article 5
Upon establishment of the bank account as provided for in Article 4 of this
Decision any financial transaction in excess of 150 KM by or on behalf of the
SDS shall be conducted through the said account.
Article 6
This Decision does not require further procedural steps to be taken and shall
supersede any regulation or law which may be in contradiction with it.
This Decision in no way releases the SDS of its obligations under the
Election Law of Bosnia and
Herzegovina or
the Law on Party Financing of Bosnia and
Herzegovina.
Article 7
For the avoidance of doubt, it is hereby specifically declared and provided
that the provisions of the Decision contained herein are, as to each and every
one of them, laid down by the High Representative pursuant to his international
mandate and are not, therefore, justiciable by the Courts of Bosnia and
Herzegovina or its Entities or elsewhere, and no proceedings may be brought in
respect of duties carried out thereunder before any court whatsoever at any time
hereafter.
Article 8
This Decision shall enter into force forthwith and shall be published without
delay in the Official Gazette of Bosnia and
Herzegovina
, the
Official Gazette of the Federation of Bosnia and
Herzegovina
and
the Official Gazette of Republika Srpska.
Sarajevo30 June
2004
Paddy Ashdown
High Representative
|