|
In the exercise of the powers vested in
the High Representative by Article V of Annex 10 (Agreement on Civilian
Implementation of the Peace Settlement) to the General Framework Agreement for
Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina, according to which the High Representative is
the final authority in theatre regarding interpretation of the said Agreement on
the Civilian Implementation of the Peace Settlement; and considering in
particular Article II.1.(d) of the last said Agreement, according to the terms
of which the High Representative shall "[f]acilitate, as the High Representative
judges necessary, the resolution of any difficulties arising in connection with
civilian implementation";
Recalling paragraph XI.2 of the Conclusions of the Peace
Implementation Conference held in Bonn on 9 and 10 December 1997, in which the
Peace Implementation Council welcomed the High Representative’s intention to use
his final authority in theatre regarding interpretation of the Agreement on the
Civilian Implementation of the Peace Settlement in order to facilitate the
resolution of any difficulties as aforesaid "by making binding decisions, as he
judges necessary" on certain issues including (under sub-paragraph (c) thereof)
“measures to ensure implementation of the Peace Agreement throughout Bosnia and
Herzegovina and its Entities”;
Bearing in mind that the Republika Srpska National Assembly, at
it is Session held on 14 May 2009, following consideration of the Republika
Srpska Government “Information on the Effects of the Transfer of Constitutional
Responsibilities from Republika Srpska to the Institutions of BiH”, adopted the
Conclusion No. 01-787/09 adopting the said “Information” as well as additional
Conclusions No. 01-788/09 (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the
Conclusions”);
Aware that the Conclusions were published in the Official
Gazette of Republika Srpska on 15 June 2009 (No. 50/09) and entered into force
the day after their publication;
Noting that under the Rules of Procedure of the Republika
Srpska National Assembly, the Conclusions, inter alia, determine policies
for the Republika Srpska authorities and provide instruction as to how to carry
out those policies and set out the obligations of the Government, ministries and
special organizations in regard to implementation of these policies;
Considering that the Conclusions undermine the exclusive
competencies of Bosnia and Herzegovina expressly listed in the Constitution of
Bosnia and Herzegovina;
Considering further that the Conclusions disregard decisions of
the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina rendered on many of the
issues listed as responsibilities “taken over from or transferred by” the
Republika Srpska;
Taking note of the fact that the Conclusions indistinctively
challenges all laws that were enacted by decisions of the High Representative by
stating that they are not based on the Constitution of Bosnia and
Herzegovina;
Noting further that the Conclusions instruct and/or demand from
certain authorities or representatives of Republika Srpska to take actions to
implement the policies contained in said Conclusions;
Concerned by the fact the Conclusions seeks to give the
Republika Srpska National Assembly the mechanism to trigger the entity voting
procedure provided for in the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, thereby
undermining the functionality of the Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and
Herzegovina and consequently damaging the ability of Bosnia and Herzegovina to
fulfill its EU and NATO Agenda;
Recalling that the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and
in particular Article III,5 thereto, foresees that responsibilities not
belonging to Bosnia and Herzegovina under the Constitution can only be assumed
by the institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina as agreed by the entities, and
that the agreement of Republika Srpska has been and shall continue to be sought
for the assumption of such responsibilities;
Also aware that the interests of the entities within the
institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina are adequately protected through the
representatives elected from the territory of those entities or delegated by the
entity institutions;
Mindful of the fact thatArticle VI, 5 of the Constitution of
Bosnia and Herzegovina provides that “[d]ecisions of the Constitutional Court
are final and binding,” and that Article III,3,(b) of the Constitution of Bosnia
and Herzegovina provides, inter alia that “[t]he Entities and any
subdivisions thereof are required to comply fully with this Constitution (…),
and with the decisions of the institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina”;
Concluding therefore that that the Conclusions undermine the
system of division of responsibilities between the State and the Entities as
established under the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina and as further
interpreted by the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina in a number of
its decisions and therefore formally disregard or challenge the above mentioned
provisions of Annex 4 to the General Framework Agreement for Peace and that by
so doing calls into question the legal existence of Republika Srpska as provided
for under the same Annex 4;
Deploring that the Republika Srpska National Assembly, by
seeking to substitute its own interpretation of the Constitution of BiH and
Article III thereof to the interpretation made by the Constitutional Court of
Bosnia and Herzegovina, undermines the authority of the highest institution
upholding the rule of law in Bosnia and Herzegovina;
Emphasizing that the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina is
the only source of competencies and that the legitimate constitutional exercise
of such responsibilities by the institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina cannot be
limited by other lower levels of government;
Recalling that the PIC Steering Board has in its Communiqué
“noted with concern that the attempts to roll back previously agreed reforms and
to undermine existing state level institutions have continued. These actions run
counter to the GFAP and the long-established efforts of the PIC Steering Board
to support state building. The authorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina need to
revise their approach without delay and play an active and positive role in
ensuring the full and unfettered functioning of all State institutions,
including those responsible for upholding the Rule of Law.”
Convinced that bringing the status quo ante is necessary
in order to re-focus the debate of domestic authorities on the challenges linked
to Euro-Atlantic integration;
Having taken into account and considered the totality of all
matters aforesaid the High Representative hereby issues the following:
DECISION
Repealing the Conclusions of the Republika Srpska National
Assembly
No. 01-787/09 and No. 01-788/09 adopted on 14 May
2009
The Conclusions of the Republika Srpska National Assembly No. 01-787/09 and
No. 01-788/09 adopted on 14 May 2009 (“Official Gazette of Republika Srpska” No.
50/09) shall be repealed as of the entry into force of this Decision.
This Decision shall enter into force and shall be published on the website of
the Office of the High Representative forthwith. It shall be published in the
Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina and of Republika Srpska without
delay.
|
Sarajevo, 20 June
2009 |
Dr. Valentin Inzko |
|
|
High Representative |
|