|
In the exercise of the powers vested in the High
Representative by Article V of Annex 10 (Agreement on Civilian Implementation on
the Peace Settlement) to the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and
Herzegovina, according to which the High Representative is the final authority
in theatre regarding interpretation of the said Agreement on the Civilian
Implementation of the Peace Settlement; and considering in particular Article
II.1. (d) of the last said Agreement, according to the terms of which the High
Representative shall “Facilitate, as the High Representative judges necessary,
the resolution of any difficulties arising in connection with civilian
implementation”:
Recalling paragraph XI.2 of the Conclusions of the Peace
Implementation Conference held in Bonn on 9 and 10 December 1997, in which the
Peace Implementation Council welcomed the High Representative’s intention to use
his final authority in theatre regarding interpretation of the Agreement on the
Civilian implementation of the Peace Settlement in order to facilitate the
resolution of any difficulties as aforesaid “by making binding decisions, as he
judges necessary” on certain issues including (under sub-paragraph (c) thereof)
measures to ensure the Peace Agreement throughout Bosnia and Herzegovina and its
Entities which “may include actions against persons holding public office or
officials … who are found by the High Representative to be in violation of legal
commitments made under the Peace Agreement or the terms for its
implementation”;
Deploring that more than one year has passed since the Local
Elections were held and the Mostar City Council constituted and that the City
Mayor of the City of Mostar has yet to be elected;
Noting that certain political stakeholders in the Mostar City
Council, by their conduct, placed individual and party interests above the
interests of citizens and therefore abused the trust of their voters and
citizens in general;
Noting further that the City Council’s failure to appoint the
City Mayor and to adopt the City Budget represents a long – term damage to the
City and its citizens and has led to a rapidly deteriorating situation in which
the Mostar City employees are not receiving salaries and public services are at
risk of coming to a standstill;
Recalling that, at its meeting held in Sarajevo on 26 March
2009, the Steering Board of the Peace Implementation Council, after reviewing
the situation in Mostar, concluded that it is unacceptable that the Mostar City
Council has failed to appoint a new Mayor almost six months after the elections
and urged the parties elected to the City Council to meet this basic obligation
to the citizens of Mostar without any further delay;
Bearing in mind the letter of the Acting High Representative of
11 March 2009, by which he addressed to the representatives of the respective
political parties to draw their attention to the fact that the situation in the
City of Mostar was untenable and warned that the High Representative could have
to take certain measures to remedy such situation;
Recalling further that, at its meeting held in Sarajevo on 30
June 2009, the Steering Board of the Peace Implementation Council called on the
High Representative to take further steps to facilitate the election of a new
Mayor;
Recalling to the High Representative’s Decision of 30 October
2009, by which he repealed the Conclusion of the City of Mostar on public ballot
and ordered election for the City Mayor by secret ballot, in accordance with the
Statute of the City of Mostar;
Having in mind that none of the seventeen attempts to elect the
City Mayor of Mostar in the last year has been successful;
Recalling again that, at its meeting held in Sarajevo on 19
November 2009, the Steering Board of the Peace Implementation Council, after
reviewing the situation in Mostar, supported the High Representative in the
action he has taken to address the political stalemate in Mostar, and invited
him to consider what further steps can be taken to facilitate resolution of the
political stalemate in Mostar;
Regretting to be forced to act on behalf of the local
authorities in order to enable the functioning of the institutions of the City
of Mostar;
Convinced that this decision does not release the elected
councilors from their obligations to elect a Mayor and subsequently adopt the
City budget and that the political stakeholders in the Mostar City Council must
finally act in accordance with their responsibilities towards the citizens;
Mindful that the City of Mostar has yet to adopt a budget for
2009 and that the failure of the City Council of the City of Mostar to elect a
Mayor has prevented such adoption, thus undermining the functionality of the
City institutions;
Noting that the paralysis of the institutions in Mostar is
preventing them from preparing the budget for 2010 in the timelines prescribed
by law;
Further convinced that the absence of budget for the City of
Mostar for 2009 can be solved under existing legislation once a new Mayor is
appointed;
Noting in particular Article 18 of the Law on Principles of
Local Self-Government in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and paragraph
3 thereto which provides for a manner of proclaiming the budget in units of
local self-government in case of failure to adopt the budget within a timeframe
of 90 days from the beginning of the budget year.
Having considered, borne in mind and noted all the matters aforesaid, the
High Representative hereby issues the following:
DECISION
Enacting Amendment to the Statute of the City of
Mostar
(Official Gazette of the Herzegovina-Neretva Canton no. 1/04
and the Official Gazette of the City of Mostar no. 4/04) and ordering Election
of the City Mayor of the City of Mostar and adoption of the City Budget of the
City of Mostar
1. The Amendment to the Statute of
the City of Mostar set out hereunder are hereby enacted and form an integral
part of this Decision. This Amendment shall enter into force on an interim basis
until adopted by the City Council of the City of Mostar in due form, without
amendments and with no conditions attached.
2. The Speaker of the City Council
is hereby directed to convene a session within three (3) days from the entry
into force of this Decision and to ensure that election of the Mayor of the City
of Mostar is conducted at that session.
3. The Mostar City Mayor shall
propose a City Budget for 2009 and the Decision on the execution of the City
Budget for 2009 within three (3) days after his/her election to the position of
the City Mayor.
4. The Speaker of the City Council
shall, within three (3) days following the proposal of the City Budget made
under Item 3 of this Decision, convene a session to consider adoption of the
Budget for 2009.
5. All political parties
represented in the City Council shall ensure that their Councilors in the City
Council attend and actively participate in the sessions of the Mostar City
Council referred to in Item 2 and 4 of this Decision.
6. For the avoidance of doubt,
should the City Council fail to adopt the City Budget for 2009 at the session
convened pursuant to Item 4 of this Decision, the Mayor shall use his legal
prerogative to proclaim the budget, in accordance with Article 18 paragraph 3 of
the Law on Principles of Local Self-Government in the Federation of Bosnia and
Herzegovina and after considering the objections that prevented the adoption of
the budget by the City Council.
7. This Decision and the amendment
that forms an integral part thereof shall enter into force on the day following
its publication on the official website of the Office of the High Representative
and shall be published in the Official Gazette of Herzegovina-Neretva Canton and
the Official Gazette of the City of Mostarwithout delay.
|
Sarajevo, 14 December 2009 |
Dr. Valentin Inzko |
|
|
High Representative |
Amendment to the Statute of the City of Mostar
(Official Gazette of the Herzegovina-Neretva Canton no. 1/04
and the Official Gazette of the City of Mostar no. 4/04)
Article 1
In Paragraph 5 of Article 44, the sentence “In the third round, a simple
majority of the elected City Councilors shall be required to elect a Mayor from
the remaining two candidates” is amended to read:
“In the third round, a simple majority of the City Councilors who are present
and voting shall be required to elect a Mayor from the remaining two
candidates”.
|