|
In the exercise of the powers vested in the High Representative
by Article V of Annex 10 (Agreement on Civilian Implementation of the Peace
Settlement) to the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and
Herzegovina, according to which the High Representative is the final authority
in theatre regarding interpretation of the said Agreement on the Civilian
Implementation of the Peace Settlement; and considering in particular Article
II.1. (d) of the last said Agreement, according to the terms of which the High
Representative shall “[F]acilitate, as the High Representative judges necessary,
the resolution of any difficulties arising in connection with civilian
implementation”;
Recalling paragraph XI.2 of the Conclusions of the Peace
Implementation Conference held in Bonn on 9 and 10 December 1997, in which the
Peace Implementation Council welcomed the High Representative’s intention to use
his final authority in theatre regarding interpretation of the Agreement on the
Civilian Implementation of the Peace Settlement in order to facilitate the
resolution of any difficulties as aforesaid “by making binding decisions, as he
judges necessary” on certain issues including, under sub-paragraph (c) thereof,
“measures to ensure implementation of the Peace Agreement throughout Bosnia and
Herzegovina and its Entities”;
Recalling furtherparagraph 12.1 of the Declaration of the Peace
Implementation Council which met in Madrid on 15 and 16 December 1998, which
made clear that the said Council considered that the establishment of the rule
of law, in which all citizens had confidence, was a prerequisite for a lasting
peace, and for a self-sustaining economy capable of attracting and retaining
international and domestic investors;
Bearing in mind the reinvigorated strategy for judicial reform to strengthen the
Rule of Law efforts inBosnia and Herzegovina in 2002/03 that was endorsed by the
Steering Board of the Peace Implementation Council on 28
February 2002;
Recalling theUN Security Council Resolution 1503 (2003) and the
statement of 23 July 2002 made by the President of the Security Council
(S/
PRST/2002/21), which endorsed the strategy
of International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (“ICTY”) for
completing investigations by the end of 2004, all trial activities at first
instance by the end of 2008, and all of its work in 2010 (S/2002/678), by
concentrating on the prosecution and trial of the most senior leaders suspected
of being most responsible for crimes within the ICTY’s jurisdiction and
transferring cases involving those who may not bear this level of responsibility
to competent national jurisdictions, as appropriate, as well as the
strengthening of the capacity of such jurisdictions;
Notingthe Security Council’s statement that the above-mentioned
Completion Strategy shall in no way alter the obligation of countries to
investigate those accused whose cases would not be tried by the ICTY and take
appropriate action with respect to indictment and prosecution, while bearing in
mind the primacy of the ICTY over national courts;
Noting alsothat the strengthening of national judicial systems
is crucially important to the rule of law in general and to the implementation
of the ICTY Completion Strategy in particular;
Noting further that, in its communiqué issued after its meeting
in Sarajevo on 26 September 2003, the Steering Board of the Peace Implementation
Council took note of UN Security Council Resolution 1503, which, inter
alia, called on the International Community to support the work of the High
Representative in setting up the war crimes chamber;
Noting the progress made in developing the capacity of the
Special Section for War Crimes of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the
Special Department for War Crimes of the Prosecutor’s Office of Bosnia and
Herzegovina;
Further noting that such capacity has sometimes been undermined
by the non-recognition of the special requirements associated to the transfer of
cases from the ICTY;
Conscious that certain provisions of the domestic legislation
applicable to the cases transferred to Bosnia
and Herzegovina
from ICTY can impede the effective
domestic trial;
Deploring, however, that the changes to legislation necessary
to facilitate the prosecution and adjudication of the cases transferred from the
ICTY have not been given the attention it requires by the authorities in
Bosnia and
Herzegovina;
Being especially seized of the urgency to amend such
provisions;
Having considered and borne in mind all these matters,
The High Representative hereby issues the following
DECISION
Enacting the Law on Amendment to
theLaw on Transfer of Cases from the ICTY to the Prosecutor’s Office
Of BiH and the use of Evidence Collected by ICTY in Proceedings Before the
Courts in BiH
(Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina , No. 61/04)
The Law which follows and which forms an integral part of this Decision shall
enter into force as provided for in Article 3 thereof on an interim basis, until
such time as the Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina adopts this
Law in due form, without amendment and with no conditions attached.
This Decision shall come into effect forthwith.
This Decision shall be published in the “Official Gazette of
Bosnia and Herzegovina ” without delay.
|
Sarajevo, 16 June
2006 |
Dr. Christian Schwarz-Schilling |
|
|
High Representative |
Law
on amendment to theLAW ON TRANSFER OF CASES
FROM THE ICTY TO THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE OF BIH
AND THE USE OF EVIDENCE
COLLECTED BY ICTY IN PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURTS IN BIH
Article 1
(Amendment to Article 2)
(1) In Article 2 (Transfer of Cases from ICTY) of the Law on Transfer
of Cases from the ICTY to the Prosecutor’s Office of BiH and the Use of Evidence
Collected by ICTY in Proceedings before the Courts in BiH (Official Gazette of
Bosnia and Herzegovina, No. 61/04; hereinafter: the Law), a new Paragraph (5)
shall be added after Paragraph (4) to read:
“(5) As an exemption from the provisions of Paragraph 4 of this Article and
from the provision of Article 139, Paragraph 4 of CPCBiH, the court shall issue
a decision on custody or on releasing of the transferred person as soon as
possible, but not later than 48 hours from the time when the Prosecutor has
filed the request for custody.”
(2) Current Paragraphs (5) and (6) of Article 2 of the Law shall become
Paragraphs (6) and (7).
Article 2
(Entry into Force of this Law)
This Law shall enter into force on a day after its publication in the
“Official Gazette of Bosnia and
Herzegovina”.
|