|
In the exercise of the powers vested in the High
Representative by Article V of Annex 10 (Agreement on Civilian Implementation of
the Peace Settlement) to the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and
Herzegovina, according to which the High Representative is the final authority
in theatre regarding interpretation of the said Agreement on the Civilian
Implementation of the Peace Settlement; and considering in particular Article
II.1.(d) of the last said Agreement, according to the terms of which the High
Representative shall “Facilitate, as the High Representative judges necessary,
the resolution of any difficulties arising in connection with civilian
implementation”;
Recalling paragraph XI.2 of the Conclusions of the Peace Implementation Conference
held in Bonn on 9 and 10 December 1997, in which the Peace Implementation
Council welcomed the High Representative’s intention to use his final authority
in theatre regarding interpretation of the Agreement on the Civilian
Implementation of the Peace Settlement in order to facilitate the resolution of
any difficulties as aforesaid “by making binding decisions, as he judges
necessary” on certain issues including (under sub-paragraph (c) thereof)
“measures to ensure implementation of the Peace Agreement throughoutBosnia and Herzegovina and its Entities”;
Convinced of the vital importance to
Bosnia
and Herzegovina
of ensuring that the rule of law is
strengthened and followed in order to create the grounds for economic growth and
foreign investment;
Mindful of paragraph I.2.a of the Conclusions of the said Bonn
Conference, which recognised “that an impartial and independent judiciary” was
“essential to the rule of law and reconciliation within Bosnia and Herzegovina”,
that the judicial appointment process must be based on merit, that a judicial
training facility must be established, and that the monitoring of the judicial
system was an essential element of the aforesaid process;
Noting the Communiqué by the Steering Board of the Peace
Implementation Council of 28 February 2002, in which the Steering Board endorsed
the reinvigorated strategy for judicial reform proposed by the Independent
Judicial Commission for 2002/03, among other things recognising the importance
of the creation of a High Judicial Council for Bosnia and Herzegovina and the
restructuring of the court system, sentiments that were reiterated in a further
Communiqué of 7 May 2002;
Appreciating the fact that the Entities reached an Agreement on
the transfer of certain responsibilities relating to the judiciary to the level
of Bosnia and Herzegovina, facilitating the creation of a single High Judicial
and Prosecutorial Council at the level of Bosnia and Herzegovina;
Noting that the law on the single High Judicial and
Prosecutorial Council at the level of Bosnia and Herzegovina entered into force
on 1 June 2004 and that it is necessary to secure a seamless transition to the
newly established Council as well as to guarantee continuous operation,
membership continuity, continuous international presence, geographical
representation and gender and ethnic balance;
Recalling the previous Decisions of the High Representative,
the High Representative’s Decision No. 214/04 dated 4 June 2004 on Appointment
of Members and Advisors to the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council of Bosnia
and Herzegovina, published in the “Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina”
No 28/04, and the High Representative Decision No. 307/04 dated 12 December 2004
on Extending the mandate of Mr. David Upcher as an Adviser to the Office of the
Disciplinary Counsel, published in the “Official Gazette of Bosnia and
Herzegovina” No 63/04, according to which the mandate of Mr. David Upcher, both
as the Advisor to the Office of the Disciplinary Counsel of the High Judicial
and Prosecutorial Council, and as the Acting Disciplinary Counsel is expiring on
1 April 2005;
Considering the fact that a candidate for the position of the
Office of the Disciplinary Counsel of the High Judicial and Prosecutorial
Council has not yet been appointed in accordance with Article 64 of the Law
on High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Official
Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina, No 25/04),
I hereby issue the following
DECISION
Extending the mandate of Mr. David Upcher as an Adviser to
the Office of the Disciplinary Counsel
Article 1
(1) This Decision provides for the extension of the mandate
of Mr. David Upcher, Attorney from United States, as an Adviser to the Office of
the Disciplinary Counsel of the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council of
Bosnia and Herzegovina (hereinafter: the Council), until 31 May 2006.
(2) Mr. David Upcher shall continue acting as Disciplinary
Counsel under Article 64 of the Law on the High Judicial and Prosecutorial
Council (hereinafter: the Law) from 1 April 2005 until such time as a
Disciplinary Counsel, appointed by the Council pursuant to the Law, has taken up
office, but no later than 31 May
2006.
Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force forthwith and shall be published without
delay in the “Official Gazette of Bosnia and
Herzegovina”.
Sarajevo, 31 March
2005
Paddy Ashdown High Representative
|