|
In the exercise of the powers vested in the High
Representative by Article V of Annex 10 (Agreement on Civilian Implementation of
the Peace Settlement) to the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and
Herzegovina, according to which the High Representative is the final authority
in theatre regarding interpretation of the said Agreement on the Civilian
Implementation of the Peace Settlement; and considering in particular Article
II.1.(d) of the last said Agreement, according to the terms of which the High
Representative shall “Facilitate, as the High Representative judges necessary,
the resolution of any difficulties arising in connection with civilian
implementation”;
Recalling paragraph XI.2 of the Conclusions of the Peace
Implementation Conference held in Bonn on 9 and 10 December 1997, in which the
Peace Implementation Council welcomed the High Representative’s intention to use
his final authority in theatre regarding interpretation of the Agreement on the
Civilian Implementation of the Peace Settlement in order to facilitate the
resolution of any difficulties as aforesaid “by making binding decisions, as he
judges necessary” on certain issues including (under sub-paragraph (c) thereof)
“measures to ensure implementation of the Peace Agreement throughout Bosnia and
Herzegovina and its Entities”;
Convinced of the vital importance to
Bosnia
and Herzegovina
of ensuring that the rule of law is
strengthened and followed in order to create the grounds for economic growth and
foreign investment;
Mindful of paragraph I.2.a of the Conclusions of the said Bonn
Conference, which recognised “that an impartial and independent judiciary” was
“essential to the rule of law and reconciliation within Bosnia and Herzegovina”,
that the judicial appointment process must be based on merit, that a judicial
training facility must be established, and that the monitoring of the judicial
system was an essential element of the aforesaid process;
Noting the Communiqué by the Steering Board of the Peace
Implementation Council of 28 February 2002, in which the Steering Board endorsed
the reinvigorated strategy for judicial reform proposed by the Independent
Judicial Commission for 2002/03, among other things recognising the importance
of the creation of a High Judicial Council for BiH and the restructuring of the
court system, sentiments that were reiterated in a further Communiqué of 7 May
2002;
Appreciating the fact that the Entities reached an Agreement on
the transfer of certain responsibilities relating to the judiciary to the level
of Bosnia and Herzegovina, facilitating the creation of a single High Judicial
and Prosecutorial Council at the level of Bosnia and Herzegovina;
Noting that the law on the single High Judicial and
Prosecutorial Council at the level of Bosnia and Herzegovina entered into force
on 1 June 2004 and that it is necessary to secure a seamless transition to the
newly-established Council as well as to guarantee continuous operation,
membership continuity, continuous international presence, geographical
representation and gender and ethnic balance;
Recalling the previous Decision of the High Representative of 3
June 2004 on Appointment of Members and Advisors to the High Judicial and
Prosecutorial Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina, published in the “Official
Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina” No 28/04, according to which the mandate of
Mr. Sven Marius Urke as an international member of the High Judicial and
Prosecutorial Council is expiring on 3 June 2005;
Considering the conclusion of the High Judicial and
Prosecutorial Council reached on its session in February of 2005 that the
international members of the said Council continue to provide significant
professional contribution to the work of the Council and that the participation
of the international members has an extremely beneficial effect to the creation
of a professional work environment, especially during a present period of
reinforced activity connected with the judicial reforms in Bosnia and
Herzegovina;
Noting the recommendation for the extension of international
membership of the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council, and particularly the
recommendation by the President of the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council
of Bosnia and
Herzegovina for
the extension of the mandate of Mr. Sven Marius Urke of 26 May 2005,
The High Representative hereby issues the following
DECISION
Extending the Mandate of Mr. Sven Marius Urke as
an International Member of theHigh Judicial and
Prosecutorial Council of Bosnia and
Herzegovina
Article 1
(1) This Decision provides for the extension of the mandate
of Mr. Sven Marius Urke, Attorney from Norway, as an international member of the
High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina (hereinafter:
the Council), until 1 August 2006.
(2) In addition to his responsibilities as a member of the
Council, Mr. Sven Marius Urke shall also act as the Advisor to the Secretariat
of the Council under the co-ordination of the Director of the Secretariat, until
1
August
2006.
Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force forthwith and shall be published without
delay in the “Official Gazette of Bosnia and
Herzegovina”.
Sarajevo , 3 June 2005
Paddy Ashdown High Representative
|