|
In the exerciseof the powers vested in
the High Representative by Article V of Annex 10 (Agreement on Civilian
Implementation of the Peace Settlement) to the General Framework Agreement for
Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina, according to which the High Representative is
the final authority in theatre regarding interpretation of the said Agreement on
the Civilian Implementation of the Peace Settlement; and considering in
particular Article II.1. (d) of the last said Agreement, according to the terms
of which the High Representative shall “Facilitate, as the High Representative
judges necessary, the resolution of any difficulties arising in connection with
civilian implementation”;
Recallingparagraph XI.2 of the Conclusions of the Peace
Implementation Conference held in Bonn on 9 and 10 December 1997, in which the
Peace Implementation Council welcomed the High Representative’s intention to use
his final authority in theatre regarding interpretation of the Agreement on the
Civilian Implementation of the Peace Settlement in order to facilitate the
resolution of any difficulties as aforesaid “by making binding decisions, as he
judges necessary” on certain issues including (under sub-paragraph (c) thereof)
“measures to ensure implementation of the Peace Agreement throughout Bosnia and
Herzegovina and its Entities”;
Recalling further paragraph 12.1 of the Declaration of the
Peace Implementation Council which met in Madrid on 15 and 16 December 1998,
which made clear that the said Council considered that the establishment of the
rule of law, in which all citizens had confidence, was a prerequisite for a
lasting peace, and for a self-sustaining economy capable of attracting and
retaining international and domestic investors;
Recalling in addition paragraph 3 of Annex II (Rule of Law and
Human Rights) to the last said Declaration, according to which the establishment
of judicial institutions at the State level, which meet an established
constitutional need to deal with criminal offences perpetrated by public
officials of Bosnia and Herzegovina in the course of their duties, and with
administrative and electoral matters, is a precondition for the establishment of
the rule of law in Bosnia and Herzegovina;
Bearing in mindthe reinvigorated strategy for judicial reform
to strengthen the Rule of Law efforts in Bosnia and Herzegovina in 2002/03 which
was endorsed by the Steering Board of the Peace Implementation Council on 28
February 2002 and noting that the aforementioned strategy was devised in
response to calls by the authorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina for firmer
International Community actions to tackle economic crime, corruption and
problems inherent in the judicial system;
Consideringthat the Steering Board of the Peace Implementation
Council in Sarajevo on 7 May 2002 called upon the local authorities to ensure
the rapid establishment of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina reminding the
Bosnia and Herzegovina authorities that the Appellate Division of the Court
needs to be operational in order to adjudicate election complaints and urging
the authorities to immediately find a sustainable solution to the problem of the
location of the Court;
Considering further that the communiqué of the
Steering Board of the Peace Implementation Council issued at Sarajevo on 31 July
2002 stated that the Board welcomes the creation of the Special Chambers and
endorses the proposal of the High Representative to include national and
international Judges and Prosecutors in a Special Panel/Department for Organized
Crime, Economic Crime and Corruption in the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina and
the Prosecutor’s Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina;
Bearing in mind that criminal activities continue to infringe
on the economic, fiscal, commercial and other social rights and interests of the
citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina and that the establishment of a Special Panel
for Organized Crime, Economic Crime and Corruption within the aforesaid Court of
Bosnia and Herzegovina will advance the robust fight against crime in Bosnia and
Herzegovina;
Convinced of the vital importance to Bosnia and Herzegovina of
ensuring that the rule of law is strengthened and followed in order to create
the ground for economic growth and foreign investment and for all the reasons as
aforesaid;
The High Representative hereby issues the following
DECISION
Enacting the Law re-amending the Law on Court of Bosnia
and Herzegovina, which is hereby attached as an integral part of this
Decision.
The said Law shall enter into force as a law of Bosnia and Herzegovina, with
effect from the date provided for in Article 13 thereof, on an interim basis,
until such time as the Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina adopts
this Law in due form, without amendment and with no conditions attached.
This Decision shall come into force forthwith and shall be published without
delay in the Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Sarajevo, 24 January, 2003
Paddy Ashdown
High Representative
LAW RE-AMENDING THE LAW ON THE COURT OF
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Preamble
The Law on the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Official Gazette of Bosnia
and Herzegovina No.29/00), as amended by Article 73 of the Law on High Judicial
and Prosecutorial Council (Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina No.
15/02), as further amended by the Law on Amendments to the Law on Court of
Bosnia and Herzegovina (Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina No.24/02)
(hereinafter the ‘Law’), is hereby re-amended as follows
Article 1
Article 9, paragraph 2 of the Law shall be deleted.
Article 2
Article 13 of the Law shall be deleted and the following new Article 13 shall
be inserted:
‘1. The Court has jurisdiction over criminal offences defined in the Criminal
Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina and other laws of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
2. The Court has further jurisdiction over criminal offences prescribed in
the Laws of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republika Srpska and
the Brcko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina when such criminal offences:
a) endanger the sovereignty, territorial
integrity, political independence, national security or international
personality of Bosnia and Herzegovina;
b) may have serious repercussions or
detrimental consequences to the economy of Bosnia and Herzegovina or may have
other detrimental consequences to Bosnia and Herzegovina or may cause serious
economic damage or other detrimental consequences beyond the territory of an
Entity or the Brcko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
3. The Court shall further be competent to:
a) take a final and legally binding position on
the implementation of Laws of Bosnia and Herzegovina and international treaties
on request by any court of the Entities or any court of the Brcko District of
Bosnia and Herzegovina entrusted to implement the Law of Bosnia and Herzegovina;
b) decide any issue relating to International
and inter-Entity criminal law enforcement, including relations with Interpol and
other international police institutions, such as decisions on the transfer of
convicted persons, and on the extradition and surrender of persons, requested
from any authority in the territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, by foreign States
or International Courts or Tribunals;
c) decide any conflict of jurisdiction between
the courts of the Entities, between the Courts of the Entities and the Courts of
the Brcko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina and between the Court of Bosnia and
Herzegovina and any other Court;
d) decide on the reopening of criminal
proceedings for criminal offences prescribed in the laws of Bosnia and
Herzegovina.’
Article 3
In Article 14, paragraph 2, item c): after the words ‘and the courts of Brcko
District’, the following words shall be inserted ‘and between the Court of
Bosnia and Herzegovina and any other court’.
Article 4
Article 15, paragraph 1 shall be deleted and the followingt new Article 15,
paragraph 1 shall be inserted:
‘1. The Court shall decide the following:
a) appeals against a judgement or decision
delivered by the Criminal Division of this Court;
b) appeals against a judgement or decision
delivered by the Administrative Division of this Court;
c) extraordinary legal remedies against final
judgments reached by the divisions of the Court, not including those that
constitute the requests for reopening of proceedings.’
Article 5
Article 16, Article 17 and Article 18 of the Law shall be deleted.
Article 6
Article 23 as amended, shall be deleted and the following Article 23 shall be
inserted:
‘1. The Administrative Division shall consist of at least five judges.
2. The Criminal Division shall consist of at least ten judges.
3. The Appellate Division shall consist of at least ten judges.
4. Panels of the Divisions shall be composed of three judges
5. A judge from another Division may be asked to sit in the Appellate
Division except in the Special Appellate Panel.’
Article 7
Article 24, paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 as amended, shall be deleted and the new
following Article 24, paragraphs 3, and 4 shall be inserted:
‘3. Individual judges may serve as a preliminary proceeding judge and as a
preliminary hearing judge.
4. The Criminal Division is chaired by its President who is elected by
all judges of the Division.’
Article 8
Article 32, Article 33, Article 34, Article 35, Article 36, Article 37,
Article 38, Article 39, Article 40, Article 41 and Article 42 of the Law shall
be deleted.
Article 9
Article 44, Article 45, Article 46, Article 47, Article 48, Article 49,
Article 50, Article 51, Article 52, Article 53, Article 54, Article 55, Article
56, Article 57, Article 58, Article 59 and Article 60 of the Law shall be
deleted.
Article 10
In Article 61, paragraph 1 the words ‘pursuant to Article 37 of this Law’ and
the words ‘pursuant to Article 57 of this Law’ shall be deleted.
Article 61, paragraph 4 as amended, shall be deleted.
Article 11
Article 63 and Article 64 of the Law shall be deleted.
Article 12
Article 65 as amended, shall be deleted and the following new Article 65
shall be inserted:
‘1. During a transitional period, a maximum number of six (6) international
judges may be appointed to the Special Panels for Organized Crime, Economic
Crime and Corruption within the Criminal and Appellate Division. International
judges shall not be citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina or of any neighboring
state. The transitional period shall last not more than four years.
2. International judges shall not be held criminally or civilly liable for
any act carried out within the scope of their duties pursuant to this law.
Article 13
Entry into force
This Law re-amending the Law on the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina shall
enter into force on 1 February, 2003.
|